Israel's assault on Gaza and Hamas

All the recent American presidents have at least outwardly recognised Palestine's right to exist. Some of them were more genuine than others. Carter and Clinton were genuinely and actively involved in trying to negotiate a solution which would involve Palestinian autonomy. Bush the first did so as well, but was more heavily weighted in Israel's favour. Even Reagan, the most Israeli-friendly president, made some efforts. Initially he was strongly pro-Israel as he saw them as a US ally against the threat posed by Arab nationalism (Iran was the big issue at this time as Saddam Hussein was still a US ally). But after Israel invaded Lebanon in 82, his policies shifted somewhat as he recognised the need for a resolution to the problem. This led to the 1983 Reagan Plan which called for "the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and their just requirements" and "the peaceful and orderly transfer of domestic authority from Israel to the Palestinian inhabitants of the West Bank and Gaza".

That leaves Bush jnr who was pretty much useless. We'll wait and see what Obama does.
 
The US most likely supports Israel's actions, as does everyone who doesn't hold Palestinian sympathies.
 
The only way to win an ideological conflict by way of war is, through sheer and utter brutality, to completely demoralize the population until they question their fundamental beliefs. WWII taught us this lesson and apparently Israel isn't willing to forget that lesson. The problem is that, if the rest of the world isn't involved, then they are watching and judging. I have no doubt that if Israel knew they could get away with it, they would 'pull a Dresden'. Personally, I believe it's the only real solution.
What I wonder is why Israel even wants to keep Gaza and the West Bank? Sure Jerusalem, but why the rest?
They don't - or they didn't in 2000 when the Israeli PM offered 95% of the West Bank and the entire Gaza strip. To which Arafat rejected and neglected to make a counter-offer. It was Arafat's fault the peace process failed in '00.
 
True Arafat's ego was a major problem in 2000. It was more complex than that though. Politically the main sticking point was that the Palestinians wanted immediate Israeli withdrawal from the territories and Israel preferred to gradually cede control.

@cookiecutter, yes it is true that Israel has been prepared to give up the West Bank and Gaza. There are still elements in Israeli politics that resist this though. There is still an element of "chosen race" mentality in the far right, who believe Israel should expand and prosper.
 
Israel says militants opened fire from UN compound

JERUSALEM – A senior Israeli military officer says Israeli troops shelled the U.N. headquarters in Gaza after coming under fire from Palestinian militants.

The Israeli artillery attack Thursday set the compound on fire, destroyed tons of food and humanitarian supplies and forced hundreds of refugees to flee.

Israel says it does not target U.N. buildings or personnel. But the officer says troops opened fire after militants inside the compound shot anti-tank weapons and machine guns. He says the troops used 155 mm artillery shells. Throughout its 20-day offensive in Gaza, Israel has accused Hamas militants of hiding in civilian areas to stage attacks.

The officer spoke on condition of anonymity pending a formal announcement expected later Thursday.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israel shelled the United Nations headquarters in the Gaza Strip on Thursday, the U.N. and witnesses said, engulfing the compound and the main warehouse in fire and destroying thousands of pounds of food intended for Palestinian refugees. The U.N. chief, in Israel for the day, demanded a "full explanation."

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is in the region to end the devastating offensive against Gaza's Hamas rulers, said the Israeli defense minister told him there had been a "grave mistake."

An Israeli spokesman said the bombardment, which left three people wounded, was under investigation.

"It was a very difficult combat situation in the immediate vicinity of the building. It could have been stray fire. It could have been Hamas fire. Israel does not target U.N. facilities or U.N. personnel," said the spokesman, Mark Regev.

Even as a top Israeli envoy went to Egypt to discuss a cease-fire proposal, the military pushed farther into Gaza in an apparent effort to step up pressure on Hamas. Ground forces thrust deep into a crowded neighborhood for the first time, sending terrified residents fleeing for cover. Shells also struck a hospital, five high-rise apartment buildings and a building housing media outlets in Gaza City, injuring several journalists.

Bullets also entered another building housing The Associated Press offices, entering a room where two staffers were working but wounding no one. The Foreign Press Association, representing journalists covering Israel and the Palestinian territories, demanded a halt to attacks on press buildings.

The army had collected the locations of media organizations at the outset of fighting to avoid such attacks.

Israel launched its war on Dec. 27 in an effort to stop militant rocket fire from Gaza that has terrorized hundreds of thousands of Israelis. Some 1,100 Palestinians have been killed, roughly half of them civilians, according to U.N. and Palestinian medical officials. Gaza health official Dr. Moaiya Hassanain said at least 50 people were killed throughout Gaza on Thursday.

Thirteen Israelis also have been killed since the campaign began. Israel says it will press ahead until Hamas halts the rocket fire and stops smuggling weapons into Gaza from neighboring Egypt.

Of course there will be absolutely no repercussions whatsoever for this.