I've played them both... both great guitars, but I have to lean towards Jackson. I love the extra frets. Opinions?
Originally posted by Vienyard
A million people would disagree with me here, but I've found that the Les Pauls have a far superior tone (well, the real good LP's anyway).
Originally posted by Silverhaze
No disagreement here! Gibson has always and will always blow Jackson away. And yes, I have both.
You like the weight of a LP???:sOriginally posted by Sunbane
I like the weight balance of most Gibsons better.
/Sun'
Originally posted by Russ
You like the weight of a LP???:s
When the alternative is a guitar that nosedives, I'd rather take the LP yes. But then again, my main guitar for years has been a mahogany flying V that is as thick as a 'Paul and just as heavy, so I'm used to heavy guitars.
I like my Jackson Rhoads a lot, but its main flaw is that it's a little neck-heavy. Having to support the neck while playing takes a lot out of my technique and enjoyment in playing.
/Sun'
Originally posted by Sunbane
Originally posted by Russ
I like my Jackson Rhoads a lot, but its main flaw is that it's a little neck-heavy. Having to support the neck while playing takes a lot out of my technique and enjoyment in playing.
/Sun'
Hmm... I've never thought of the Rhoads as neck heavy... it does balance more level to the ground than most other guitars, but it's definitely not like a kelly or explorer... which I think want to dive....
At least for moe....