Cheiron said:
Does any of what he says (as well as some of the other respondents), make you think about your own ideas of 'True Metal' and the your opinions, which you integrated into the questions?
The 100 Questions idea was probably better on paper than in practice, but I still consider the motivation behind it as a positive thing.
Some thoughts:
I believe that media is powerful and does shape the way people think about things.
I believe that the meaning of words is important. (I buy and read books on language... not really serious academic work on the subject, but there is an underlying context to the humorous work of men like Lederer and Humphreys that is very disturbing to me).
I believe history is important. (I buy and read history books... some quite thorough and terribly tedious to get through...)
... and I believe that the current environment is causing (or was caused by? chicken and egg!) media with no connection to or appreciation of heavy metal beyond its popularity to exert its "outsider" influence over the art itself, to the detriment of that art and distorting its history. My way to combat it is to peel away the hype and commercial aspects and hold up
authenticity as something to be valued in and of itself.
When it comes to Cobbett answering the questions, some of his answers were brilliant, and some of his answers I think completely dodged the question being asked (which of course I am going to focus on more here, haha).
First of all, he nailed the tone of the interview: "I'm sure he was expecting nothing less, considering the tone of the interview, which is itself confrontational" while at the same time really dropping the ball here: "and irrelevant to my artistic output." Does anybody familiar with Cobbett's work really think his answers are irrelevant to his artistic output? The interview captures attitudes beyond "what were you thinking when you wrote this one piece of work" and is more about how the artist thinks about music in general.
Tell us why heavy metal is worthy of respect.
Perhaps the question was worded badly since his answer isn't a bad one, but would anybody reading LotFP say I give things a free pass simply for being metal?
His whole "why am I considered an expert?" thing seems... false to me. He's made one of the best albums of this year, made my favorite album ever a few years back, and has his hand in a variety of musical styles so he has perspective. Who better to ask?
Selling out? Maybe it's still possible for metal bands to "sell out" in some parts of the world. Where I live the concept of "selling out" seems rustic.
He's either not being serious here, or he's the most jaded musician to ever answer an interview. heh. Or maybe it's just a setup for his answer to the next question.
Tell me how an album that takes hundreds of hours for an average of four people to write and record, at a cost of thousands of dollars, is too expensive if a copy costs as much as three or four hours of minimum wage pay.
This question and the one after weren't answered. They were commented upon, but not answered. There were assumptions read into the questions that aren't in the wording of the questions themselves!
And by the way, why do you qualify every single reference to music with "Heavy Metal"? Metal does not exist in a vacuum.
I've been looking for an excuse to address this answer. The reason I was qualifying every single reference to music with "heavy metal" because I am not talking about
music as a whole, I am talking about
heavy metal specifically. It doesn't exist in a vacuum, but I don't accept the notion that it doesn't exist at all. If it doesn't exist, what the hell are all these heavy metal bands from the past 36 years? And If it does exist, it can be talked about, analyzed, explored, and characteristics identified and judged. Which is what the point of the 100 questions.
Tell us why, if bands go on tour to "promote" an album, fans pay to go see these live commercials.
Tell us why bands talk about their fanbase as being "the kids". Tell us whether you feel bands that do this are writing music for children, and tell us whether you think children listening to heavy metal is a good idea.
I was looking for an exploration of the language used surrounding this. To me, calling the fans "kids" or "tigers" are both equally ridiculous and inappropriate. He dealt with the tour question quite nicely though.
Tell us whether you would rather listen to real heavy metal bands adopting mainstream sounds to try to be more popular, or mainstream "heavy music" bands adopting heavy metal methods to try to be more cool and credible.
I love how he invalidates the question and then immediately validates the idea behind it.
Tell us why so few black people play heavy metal.
Totally avoided the question.
His Young Adult Fiction was highly entertaining yet completely irrelevant to what was asked. Is the moral of the story that unprepared people with no clue won't be successful?
Cheiron said:
Does it bother you that some of the bands you love, or would label as 'true metal', don't give a shit about 'true metal.' Does them not giving a shit... make them no longer 'true metal'?
Actually, it's the bands that are
aware and do different things anyway that make the best music. Opeth's Morningrise, Hammers' own August Engine, Amorphis' Tales... and Elegy (although their opinions voiced at that time certainly heralded their decline), Fleurety's Min Tid Skal Komme... all albums that didn't play by the rules and that's part of the reason these bands tower(ed) over bands that are so metal they shit steel.
My love of floofy prog rock and my enjoyment gained by going to punk shows gives me some comfort that I am not the closed minded musical fascist that some might suspect. Shit, even within metal, the power/prog people think that LotFP is anti-power metal and the death metal diehards call it a power metal zine.
And I suspect the people reading the print version are not the same people reading the articles online, and each has its own focus and flavor, two sides of the coin.
And don't the Star Trek Convention question and the "Unpopular" question make it pretty obvious that I'm not blind to the "extreme logical" conclusion of "true metal" thinking?
Basically, I'm rambling to avoid doing real writing at the moment.