Kate Beckinsale should marry us all petition!

*deflowers kate beckinsale*

mwahahaha shes ine now. . .none can have her. .





















except maybe johanna, and zsuzsa, . . . o_O

david_wenham2.jpg


elena_anaya4.jpg

nothing better than hot vampires

hugh_jackman1.jpg


vanhelsing3.jpg


vanhelsing2.jpg


 
*Overdone Alan Rickman accent* "Blast you BobVex, if anyone is going to deflower this girl in a melodramatic, 19th-century mannerrrr........It'll be meee!"

{after reading BobVex's perverted Skeletor move}

*(again)Overdone Alan Rickman accent* "I'll get you, you BobVex...."



'Dead Ringers' rocks!!!
 
_Zsuzsa_ said:
:oops:

But Underworld DINDT suck damnit >8(

underworld.jpg


http://i.xanga.com/shuilaba/underworld.jpg

underworld.jpg



I like the warrior vampire look better ;)
the only GOOD thing about that movie is the poster :lol:
other than that it's pretty weak

i mean, they have huge werewolf masks, which were pretty well done, but they're over the actor's shoulders for christ sake :lol: you can see it's a mask

and the dude turns into xmen's nightcrawler on the end! WTF was that! :lol:

And that scene where they walk on the walls.... DAMN that was terrible :lol:
you could see the paws weren't even touching the walls in sync with the drag they were doing :p

Van Helsing on the other hand....aaaaaah that was beautiful
tons and tons of marvelous sfx
I mean, they even had a million dollar expensive full CG character that showed only on the first 5 minutes of the movie!
Now THAT is beautiful! :D
 
^you are damn right


@Yanko: yes, but Van Helsing was made out of millions of dollars while Underworld was a low budget movie :rolleyes: You cannot compare the two for its obvious that they didnt have money to use CG in every second minute like in Van Helsing.
And now, I didnt notice the masks or the wall walking thing.
 
_Zsuzsa_ said:
^you are damn right


@Yanko: yes, but Van Helsing was made out of millions of dollars while Underworld was a low budget movie :rolleyes: You cannot compare the two for its obvious that they didnt have money to use CG in every second minute like in Van Helsing.
And now, I didnt notice the masks or the wall walking thing.
THAT'S BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE CG EYE o_O

:p

but seriously, i think they had enough budget to make the movie a little better.
I mean, it's not bad, but it's overly cheesy :p

OH SHIT! That's why you like it, now it makes sense!!! :lol: :loco:
 
Tut Ankh Amon said:
I mean, it's not bad, but it's overly cheesy :p
i just saw van helsing the other day. . .it was horrible. . .if every gird in middle europe looked like that. . id move there right now. . .all the cheesy catch phrases. . .

"if your late. . . .run like hell" ffuuuuuuuuuuuuck that. . .
i give i 2 stars out of 5
 
c'mon, it's like going to see MATRIX for the philosophical issues :lol:

it's a popcorn visual movie god damnit, i don't know why people expect so much from that kind of movie :p
it's OBVIOUS it's gonna have silly things, the strong thing about them is the visuals
don't like visuals? Don't go see it :p
 
_Zsuzsa_ said:
So you only care about the looks? =P
on van helsing?!
hell yeah :lol:
there's nothing else there, just the looks (and i'm talking about CG, when it comes to nerding around in a movie theater i even forget about the women :lol: seriously :p)!

I mean, i loved the movie, but that doesn't mean i found anything deep in it :p