If people want to be able to wield these weapons, they should join the military, IMO. I know many will disagree, but that's just my opinion. I hope I haven't offended anyone too much, but oh well.
No, I agree. Only police and military should carry weapons. But then again, I don't know what it's like in the US, where everyone and his brother can walk around with a 9mm.
I fucking hate guns.
Maybe because I REALLY had to use them in military I hate them... call me crazy.
Is that the new hobby these days?
I don't fucking get it...
I don't get it either. Seems most of those civilians-with-guns are people who have no idea how dangerous those things are. Posing in front of a mirror is all nice and good, but fact is, most people who actually carry weapons because it's their job know how ugly and dangerous those things are.
Karen, I've always wondered this. In the US military, we'd get smacked for calling the weapon, "a gun". Is the US military the only one this anal about this nomenclature or is it other militaries as well?
Well, I can't speak for the military, but at police school we always referred to our revolvers as a "weapon". Never as "guns" or "revolvers" (the Flemish equivalents of those words, of course). I think it's mainly because it sounds so stupid, so TV-like, and "weapon" sounds a bit more serious.
Anyway, you all probably know my opinion about weekend warriors, wannabe's, watched-too-much-TV's and other civilians with firearms, so I won't get started on that. Since we're discussing firearms, my service weapon is a S&W M64, 4" .38 SPL+P. Sure, it's not the newest of weapons, but it gets its ugly job done, and it's reliable to a fault.