Jim LotFP said:
I consider being lazy with recordings far less of a crime than rushing new material into the studio which is what everyone else seems to do.
Hmmm... good point.
This got me thinking about something only psuedo related, but I tend to think that one of the major reasons there's so much half assed stuff out these days is because too many dudes are doing too many side projects. I don't think the guys in Zeppelin ever thought, "We can't do that style of song in our band - it won't fit. We need to do side projects to express every facet of our creativity." Zep just put everything that they dug into one band - and thus that one band became far better than it woulda been otherwise, as it had a much broader range of material.
Alot of these side projects only come up with a few good/great songs anyways, so was it really necessary to start a whole new band just to do a few good songs in that style? Couldn't those few songs make the main band more diverse and interesting? Why pigeonhole your main band? Seems counterproductive - but then I have no idea what the finances are like for underground bands. I imagine the million and one side projects are done simply for financial reasons (like if you're paid $500 per album, it's best to record 500 albums per year sorta thang), and "creative freedom" is just the arty-farty excuse for 'em.
Oh, if you hate Zeppelin - then use Sabbath or Priest in the example above.
Anyways, I'd rather see more bands be willing to go that route than to think that they need outlets from their main band. I guess all the silly subgenre politics have lead to this... and it's too bad.
I should prolly order that new Enslaved, as they're definitely one of the bands out there who aren't afraid to incorporate whatever the Hell they wanna do into their catalog.