Heavenly Call
Member
Maybe THIS will be the thread where we finally learn what IS metal and what IS NOT. I can't wait to see how it comes out in the end!
I dunno. If you pay attention to what Hagström normally says, it's not really any surprise.
He's not being a dick, he just HATES bands that copycat each other and write their music by the numbers. Hell, the whole reason he plays the way that he does is because he thought the emphasis of everyone around him starting out on shred and being wanky was EXTREMELY fucking lame...so he wanted to play brutal rhythm instead.
His point is that Nightwish isn't doing anything different, aren't pushing themselves and are essentially just heavy pop music.
I mean seriously, is he wrong?
So he doesn't consider Nightwish metal. Eh, not shit-talking in my book. Simply his opinion, though expressed a bit crudely.
...with that said, I bet Hagstrom would be the first one to jump on a tour with Nightwish. The guy sounds like a tool to me, so who cares what he thinks?
~Brian~
Edit: To further elaborate on the point... One of the main concepts of "being metal" (as a person or music) is the whole being genuine aspect of things... You know...."stay true" and all that lame catchphrase shit. Pop music is the exact opposite of that where everything is expected to be produced and fake and a product. Now when you judge Nightwish on that sliding scale, I think even as fan, it's pretty obvious where it sits.
I disagree. Why is pop music "produced" and "fake"? I can take a guess. Because one of a handful of songwriters write a lot of the pop music out there and it's written for one reason: to sell.
...
The keyboard player of Nightwish is also their lead songwriter and producer. That's quite a departure from the typical "fake" pop music formula.
I know some people share the guy's opinion about bands like Nightwish. I find that kind of close-mindedness in metal to be irritating, but what can you do? It's found in every music genre. There will always be the music snobs, even if some of them don't have much room to talk.
Hahahaha, I about died reading that. An onstage prolapsed Spears would be news indeed."My fuckin' pussy's hangin' out!"
I'm just just limiting myself to Britney and the Jonas Brothers and including pretty much all charting dance music when I say "pop".
he got together what he considered the Top 40 Prog Albums to listen to and write something that sounded like those. It's an amazing, ass-kicking album... ...but if that isn't "the formula", I don't know what is.
Some people would call that "phoning it in", but really that's not even the issue I'm discussing here as it's completely irrelevant. I'm just stating that Nightwish very obviously falls into that category of bands without much deliberation at all.
I don't see how it's close-minded at all. He didn't say Nightwish sucks. In fact he specifically stated that they're probably pretty good.
What he's saying is that Nightwish has more in common with ABBA than they do with Slayer...essentially...and he's voicing his general frustration that that the scene has gone in that direction.
So you're lumping Nightwish in with Britney, the Jonas Brothers, and a pop writer who did a masterful job at "phoning a metal album in", in spite of the fact that Nightwish has not admitted to writing their albums in the same fashion as Frost*, and they've released six albums that have stayed true to themselves, which earlier you indicated was what metal was all about.
As if that's not a patronizing thing to say. It's closed-minded because while he may admit that they might be good, he's essentially saying that he'd rather that they and bands like them didn't exist at all. Because they are somehow diluting the metal scene.
I have no problem with someone not liking something. I have a problem when they want to prevent me from liking it, or prevent me from having access to it. Hypothetically let's just say his conversation with the record execs or whomever they were made some waves and Nightwish got dropped. Would that be good for metal? Would that be good for fans that enjoy both Meshuggah and Nightwish? I know it's an implausible hypothetical but I get the distinct feeling from that interview that he'd be thrilled if it were the case.
Man, I thought we left this shit behind in the 80s. Basically he's calling bands like Nightwish poseurs. But if you've got it in your head that being metal is acting a certain way or playing a certain way, then you're the one posing.
It's freakin' music. People who act as if it's something more than that, like it's a way of life or something are missing the point.
What, could you not like Nightwish if it were on a major label instead of a Metal label?
And if you were on the same label as a band that you were completely embarassed about, you would be entitled to voice your opinion like that simply because of the fact that the people who are representing you are doing so alongside such a band.
Yep, it really is kind of a renaissance, at least that's the way it seems to me. I guess it's natural that some people would get irked by bands in the genre not conforming to their preconception of what metal is/should be.The metal scene is going in several different directions all at once and that's a great thing.