New album Foregone out February 2023

It's not necessarily a bad thing to be unpredictable, but it's also not a bad thing to take a cool sound and evolve/refine it over a few albums. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I really enjoy an album like SOAPF, anticipate something similar in the next release, and then get hit with a brooding, melancholic album like SC (I'm being nice with that description). As a fan it's nice to believe you'll get something in a similar vein from previous albums of a band you like, particularly if it's the same band members and a short time period between releases. With IF you simply cannot expect that, and it means I go into each new album with trepadation rather than excitement. Well, I used to anyway. Nowadays it's more morbid curiousity.
There was a Fredrik Nordström interview where he talked about how In Flames were always wanting to change their sound, and how he tried telling them, I don't remember his exact words but something like "Sure, we can change, but I think we should develop the current sound, start from the existing foundation". Honestly I think that would've quite probably worked better for In Flames. I can see Reroute being a logical continuation to Clayman, but after that they've basically been all over the place.

And why, oh why didn't they want to keep the Come Clarity production team for ASOP? :(

Congratulations to Ciko! :)
 
There was a Fredrik Nordström interview where he talked about how In Flames were always wanting to change their sound, and how he tried telling them, I don't remember his exact words but something like "Sure, we can change, but I think we should develop the current sound, start from the existing foundation". Honestly I think that would've quite probably worked better for In Flames. I can see Reroute being a logical continuation to Clayman, but after that they've basically been all over the place.

And why, oh why didn't they want to keep the Come Clarity production team for ASOP? :(

Congratulations to Ciko! :)

Nordstrom knew what he was doing. He just wanted the band to put in more work than they were willing to commit to. Rather than have an attitude of "we have a reputation and are proud of this, so we should focus on bringing the best out of ourselves", IF attitude has always been "we'll just make whatever we feel like making at the time, and hopefully people will like it".

Whether you agree with the first or second attitude is open for debate. Some would say their attitude to making music is the right one. Basically, do whatever you want to do even if it turns out to be shit. Others would suggest the first attitude, with a more careful and planned approach, is how one should treat a job. In Flames have in a lot of ways treated their career like a hobby, and maybe that's why Anders and Bjorn have been going strong for so many years. And I say "going strong" only in the sense they have never had a hiatus of any kind, not that the music itself has been strong throughout.

I believed for a long time that they purposefully pivoted to a more commercial sound for the big bucks... but nowadays I'm not so convinced. I think they just changed their sound because they didn't want to put in as much effort as they had been previously. Jesper and Bjorn, at least. They saw other bands getting loads of exposure and success with far less effort instrumentally and thought, fuck it, we can do that too. Anders was the only one who really wanted to stretch the limits of his 'instrument', and so the band ended up revolving around that. Can't really speak for Daniel or Peter as they weren't ever direct songwriters.

I'd say that only changed after Siren Charms - moving to the likes of Benson as producer is clearly a calculated move, as he has no connection to their past music in any way.

Production has always been a total shitshow since they left Nordstrom. Not all bad, but wildly inconsistent.

Reroute - muddy guitars, muddy vocals, muddy everything really
STYE - that snare, fuck. Production as a whole far too flat, the album sounds a million times better on Used & Abused
CC - works for the album but draining to listen to at times as it is so in-your-face
ASOP - utter garbage. Embarrassing guitar tone, vocals all wrong
SOAPF - another one where the production works for the album, but very different to what came before it
SC - garbage
Battles - garbage
ITM - slightly improvement on the last two, but still weak
Foregone - most metal production they've had since CC for sure, just a shame about the music
 
Congrats ciko! The SC fan club just keeps on collecting Ws, has huge rizz, big dicks, haters seething. It is literally impossible to not get laid, when you "accidentally" pop in that bad boy record.

I didn't read through all the interview exceprts, but kudos for the work, the ones I read were interesting for sure. There was a quote saying Colony sounds the samey and I actually agree. It is a huge stretch to say the record is just a variation of one song, but it lacks the charm of Whoracle and Clayman, it's more in your face, but throughout an entire record it gets a bit samey.

And if we are doing the Spotify wrapped thingy:
 

Attachments

  • 1000001207.jpg
    1000001207.jpg
    610.4 KB · Views: 6
  • 1000001208.jpg
    1000001208.jpg
    495 KB · Views: 6
Well. That's some kind of a mistery. Because, apparently, The production team was mostly the same, with the inclusion of Roberto Laghi as bass producer.
Well, there are different definitions for "production", and some talk of pre-production, production and post-production as distinct phases.

However, I was thinking of mixing and mastering / post-production. Come Clarity was sent to Tonteknik Studio in Umeå (northern Sweden) for mixing and mastering. ASOP was mixed and mastered by other personnel; the mix was done by Toby Wright and mastering was done by Stephen Marcussen at Marcussen Mastering Studios, Hollywood, California.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
After watching the documentary a couple more of times, my only explanation is that they were all too drunken to even understand how it was the overall sound.

The guitars in the final mix sound very similar to what we can sense at the studio . Now, being more serious, I think that they were way too relaxed. There's the feeling that they were spending more time partying with friends than doing actual work.

I still cannot understand, I think it was Jasper, saying that the overall sound was going to be massive. Yes. Massive was the exact word. While the guitars sound just weak.
 
Maybe he meant massively shit, idk. If they did send it to America then there's the problem. In Flames + America = fucking disaster
 

This was the interview I was thinking of. Some interesting stories / memories there.

Anders is mentioned as someone who wanted to move into a more American sound, but I believe ALL of In Flames were on board with the sound change at that point. In another interview it said the Clayman sessions took place in a "tense atmosphere" and that Jesper and Björn were already planning to cut down on guitar melodies, but Nordström convinced them not to. Further, both Peter and Björn have talked about how they arranged the songs democratically on Clayman and Reroute. Also Anders was disappointed when he heard the music for STYE for the first time, as he thought there wasn't enough lead guitar. So I would say the possible disagreement on musical style only started later on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
Yeah that interview is really interesting. I remember being surprised when I read that Anders was the one who was disappointed with the guitar work on STYE, as during that time period he was the one blamed for altering the IF sound. Turns out Jesper and Bjorn were far more to blame than Anders ever was. Whilst he obviously wanted to have more focus on his vocals, I get the impression from recent interviews that he wanted it to be interwoven with the guitar work, rather than at the expense of it. In the end we kind of got that with Come Clarity, but only because the band were barely talking to each other at that point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
When it comes to production, I usually go for TJR or Clayman as their best. Whoracle is a bit flat for my taste and -- even though I seem to be the only one -- I will argue that Colony is one of their most badly produced records and is in serious need of a remix & remaster job. TJR is a bit polarizing in terms of production but I've always loved that the kick drum is nice and punchy. Although TJR is my personal favorite IF record, I would say that Clayman is probably their 'perfect' record and I can say with 100% confidence that I do not believe they will ever make anything even remotely close to that kind of package again; the mix, the overall production, the songwriting quality, all of it. It is their peak and it's a shame they don't want to use it as a blueprint for music moving forward. I mean, I guess they tried when they re-recorded 4 songs from it, but we won't get into that clusterfuck again.

It's weird to me that it hasn't even been a full year since Foregone came out because it feels like it's been a lifetime. The lack of press, the lack of advertisement, the lack of songs in the set, Foregone feels more like 'Forgotten' and it is still very strange to me. It might be their least promoted album ever. Outside of this forum, and I assume their social media -- I don't know, I don't follow any of their socials -- I never hear anything about it. I follow plenty of metal media and it is never talked about. I watched a live clip of Ordinary Story from one of their recent shows and even their backdrop was just a white In Flames logo. No Foregone artwork, nothing to indicate they're supporting a new album.

After a lot of thought about it recently, In Flames doesn't feel like In Flames anymore. And I'm not even talking about Foregone specifically. The band doesn't feel the same to me. It truly feels like Anders & Bjorn & American Friends. There is this odd stigma around it. Like, when I see a picture of the band in it's current state, my brain wants to say "oh, it's a side project that Anders and Bjorn formed." I can't really explain it, it just feels really fucking weird. I don't want to call it a fall from grace or anything that dramatic, but I would call it a serious case of phoning it in and I'm calling it right now -- put this shit in your signatures, boys -- In Flames lasts another 2-3 years. Tops. I think they've had enough, they're just going through the motions and they haven't admitted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
For me, it feels like In Flames have been putting out albums with no real merit or, dare I say, sense of purpose since Battles. Even on SC I think they were trying to do something unique, albeit they ended up falling flat on their faces. Battles is where it just feels like albums are being put out because "it's that time again". Just a routine. They haven't really put out anything since SOAPF where I'd say, yeah, at least three or four of these songs deserve to be in the setlist in future. That's a long time.

If they did break up, nothing of value would realistically be lost at this point. Whether you like Foregone or not, the fact is there are far better bands doing whatever sound IF are trying to copy on the song in question from that album. So it has been since SOAPF, and I say that as someone who thought ITM was OK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
I thought IF were a few years away from breaking up around the time SOAPF came out.

Bryce did say that he had expected he would be in the band until they called it quits, which is either his way of saying he was planning on being with them indefinitely or that the band calling it quits was going to be happening relatively soon (i.e. the next couple of years).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
Obviously it’s just speculation on my part, but it feels like they’re winding down. Anders is 50 years old and while it’s not like he’s a dinosaur or something, I just don’t see him being that guy who comes out on stage with his gray hair and reading glasses — I guess he’s halfway there already… — and belting out Embody the Invisible. I would imagine Anders and Bjorn are set up pretty well financially at this point and probably don’t NEED to do this. Maybe they are still full of energy and inspiration but it certainly doesn’t shine through if so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
It's an interesting one, really, because there's no precedent for how long MDM bands go for. The vocal side of things is particularly an issue, as let's be honest, even with technique involved the human voice box isn't designed to handle growling and screaming for 100+ days out of the year. The vocalists who adapted their technique over the years - Stanne and Speed, for example - still sound OK. Anders can sound alright but changed his technique really late in the game, which puts him at a disadvantage. Then you've got vocalists like Lindberg who never really used a technique and he now sounds like an asthmatic gargoyle. I know some people still like the new ATG stuff, but the vocals just don't do it for me at all.

But yeah, frankly it's tough to imagine any of the MDM bands going much past 55-60 years old with their original vocalists. Arch Enemy are obviously ahead of the game in that respect, and Speed is only 45 so Soilwork don't need to worry too much yet. The likes of Anders and Stanne, though... you can't envision them going on for too much longer. Stanne has obviously refined his technique a lot and become very comfortable with it, but even with the best will in the world, father time catches all of us in the end.

As I said before, to me IF as the band I knew and appreciated pretty much ended with SOAPF. Pretty much all written by Bjorn, very different but still authentic and I give it a pass. SC should have been an Anders side project. Battles, ITM and Foregone have been Howard Benson's In Flames which, to me anyway, is a totally different entity. Doesn't evoke the same feelings, doesn't have the same magic, doesn't come close to making me feel energised in the same way as a few bands in the past decade or so have done. AE's Will to Power (aware it's not liked by most others), Nightrage's Wolf to Man, Beast in Black's Dark Connection and Fellowship's The Sabrelight Chronicles... all way, way ahead in terms of how much I enjoyed an album compared to any of IF's efforts since SOAPF. Even Amaranthe's The Nexus is far beyond for me, and that's pretty much as commercialised as metal gets.

It ain't necessarily about IF becoming commercialised for me. I listen to a lot of stuff like that elsewhere and enjoy it. The IF formula just lost that spark somewhere along the way. Jesper leaving was a huge part of that. Bjorn carried it on himself for one album, but it feels like he put everything he had into SOAPF and had nothing left afterwards except recycled riffs, generic solos and the occasional, few seconds reminder of past, better songs.

For what it's worth, as far as ITM and Foregone are concerned, I don't think current In Flames are bad. They aren't the joke they were during the SC & Battles era. They're back to being somewhat respectable and I can understand why people would like the more recent stuff. ITM was solid for me, too, although not on a 'wow this is awesome' level. Just a 'this is fine' level. Foregone more of a 'I somewhat get what they were going for, with half of the album anyway, but no, not for me'. And regardless, neither album has the old IF magic that disappeated after 2011. Bjorn used what was left and that was it.

I enjoy coming on here and chatting shit with you guys about the band, because they were the band that got me into metal and for that reason alone I'll always have a soft spot for them. They were my favourite band up until Siren Charms. With that said, I'm over them as a contemporary interest. It's now all rooted in the past, and Foregone really did make me realise that, when none of the singles and the album itself got more than a handful of listens for me. I really knew for the first time that I am done with In Flames. I think @eochaid kind of had the same reaction. It sucks in some ways, but I guess life is this way.

What it means is that if they announced tomorrow that the band was done, I'd be okay with it. A few years ago I would have been sad, even after Battles, but now... I'm good. They've given me more than enough and I'm cool with whenever they decide to stop, whether that be tomorrow, a year, five years or a decade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
Yeah, I'm good with it if they call it quits. To be perfectly honest, if they do a final album before that time, it would be really, really cool if they got that core group back together for it. If I could choose how In Flames goes out, I would say one final album and world tour with Anders, Bjorn, Jesper, Peter and Daniel, minus Jesper for the tour, culminating with one big final concert in Gothenburg recorded for a live album/blu-ray. It would consist of a career-spanning setlist. Yes I realize this won't happen. It's a pipe dream but to me, that's the fitting ending to the In Flames story. I don't think it would be right to end the band without at least a final show with all of those guys. And if they did, my ass would be on a plane to anywhere in the world that show happened.

Even with all of the shit I've talked, all the complaining and making fun of, there is a part of me that will be very sad when In Flames is done. A wave of nostalgia will hit like a ton of bricks and tears will be shed. No matter what happens with the band, how many more albums they release that I don't enjoy, the golden years of In Flames will always exist and I will always hold onto them with an amazing fondness. For the music lover, or at least for me, there are certain bands that evoke a specific memory where you can go all the way back to where you were the first time you heard it; you can remember exactly how it sounded in that moment, how the air smelled, you can almost taste the music. It's like being transported in a time machine. The Jester Race, Whoracle, Colony and Clayman will always be like that for me. Even if I regret the Jester Head tattoo on the back of my neck today, on the day In Flames is done, I will be unbelievably proud of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
I think @eochaid kind of had the same reaction. It sucks in some ways, but I guess life is this way.

Yep. I don't mind discussing about the old days but I'm not interested in the current state of the band and I don't care what they will bring in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
Assuming Bjorn wrote most, if not all, of the classic solos - as from memory Jesper has never liked doing solos - it's kind of hard to understand how Bjorn went from penning solos like we heard on Satellites and Astronauts (probably my favourite solo in any song), OFTW, Evil in a Closet, Come Clarity and even SOAPF (title track) to what came on Siren Charms, Battles, and ITM. Not counting Foregone as Chris probably wrote most of the solos. It's like Bjorn's understanding of how to create a solo to fit a song just went out the window after 2011 and was replaced by a philosophy of creating a batch of generic solos first and then randomly inserting them into songs later.

I can hardly reconcile that the guy who wrote the S&A solo did... well, almost anything from SC or Battles. It's an insane regression... no, sorry, "evolution". Although it'd be the equivalent of a human "evolving" into a slug, but whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
That's when the work of a producer is really important. It's not as much as the final sound of the product as it is pushing the musicians beyond their limits and, most of the time, will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpyro125
Overall I like the song, the chorus lyrics are ass though. Sounds like some kind of stupid nursery rhyme.

Dead Alone and LYBD are probably the STYE songs I feel benefit most from being played live. Much more powerful in a live environment. Superhero sounds great live too.