I only listened to Queen and I liked it. Is the rest of the album pretty heavy with tons of riff and stuff???
Also: What do you think of Haggard?
Also: What do you think of Haggard?
Ram Zet and Haggard: Worth it or not?
- Thread starter AsModEe
- Start date
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
Ram-Zet is good. Queen is very representative of the album, so yes.
You'd do better to ask this in my sticky thread though, next time.
You'd do better to ask this in my sticky thread though, next time.
Generation_Speedkill
Member
Haggard has by far been the band to perfectly meld metal and classical into one thing. While bands likes Symphony X, Children of Bodom, Stratovarius, ect. have integrated classical styles and techniques into metal guitar, Haggard presents a more accuracte, complete picture of what classical should like. Their music is incredibely well-arranged and its great diversity - distinctively death metal vocals, somber piano lines, crunching guitars, choral-like female vocals, grand,emotive, and epic orchestrations. Check them out.
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
no country for old wainds
Active Member
- Nov 23, 2002
- 26,886
- 9,755
- 113
anonymousnick2001
World's Greatest Vocalist
Fuck this squabbling!
Haggard are awesome.
Summoning are better, IMO, but unrelated. The bands are both neoclassical, but in entirely different manners and through different aesthetical approaches. So comparsions are really unnecessary. Haggard sound more like a better composed version of newer Therion with Symphony-X-esque choir arrangments and Winds-styled instrumentation. And yet with a twist.
Haggard are awesome.
Summoning are better, IMO, but unrelated. The bands are both neoclassical, but in entirely different manners and through different aesthetical approaches. So comparsions are really unnecessary. Haggard sound more like a better composed version of newer Therion with Symphony-X-esque choir arrangments and Winds-styled instrumentation. And yet with a twist.
