- Apr 10, 2006
- 11,386
- 2,033
- 113
See I like music and I value it highly but a lot of stuff about why I like it / or some of it remains a mystery to me. I also study agriculture and some of the concepts that I come across in life sciences or some technical subjects catch my eye and I try to somehow apply them on other things, like art.
Basically I've been trying to explain to myself why I can't stand some shit and then on the other end feel the need to revisit some music like I was addicted. Of course I could just call prog metal faggotry as I was doing for ages but what does it really come to?
First point that I made to myself is that there are some aspects of music that when contained in it make it a terrible experience for me and I can't stand it. Examples: out of tune singers in clean vocals stuff, standard three chord harmony in pop music (recycled for the millionth time), the sound of cheap keys in country/folk music, etc etc. On the other end there are some aspects that make me like the music.
A concept that is closest to this is negative and positive selection, a simple idea in breeding of plants or animals for example. Basically you can watch out for some negative attributes and throw out shit that contains them (negative selection), or look out for positive attributes and keep shit that contains them (positive selection). I know it's simple but it's the closest I got to describe the process of how my mind subconsciously decides what I like, or even how I could learn to deliberately imitate it.
Another thing that I heard mentioned during some gardening lecture (laugh all you want), is the idea of "three perceptions", which are the following:
(1) sensation delight
(2) delight from imagination
(3) delight from understanding
I immediately thought I could apply those on perception of music. (1) Omg the sound on this Ildjarn record, (2) the things that my mind creates as a reaction to the music - maybe some feelings and memories connected with the song or its individual melodies, lyrics, etc, and (3) understanding how the music was written, what it was inspired by, how to play it perhaps, etc.
I feel like the first two are kinda emotional approach and the third one is somewhat technical and I immediately thought of certain people that lean towards the former and some that put more emphasis on the latter. There are people like mom who would never read sheets while listening to music and says that the only thing that matters is what it sounds like and what it makes you feel, and then there are more technical listeners who would go for contemporary music and study serialist tone rows and spectralist tone clusters and have the delight from understanding something that the first group wouldn't consider beautiful at all.
And then there are people who stick cucumbers up their asses. I need to go but I might add some more rambling later.
Phone edit: I realize the idea of three perceptions probably was about art in the first place, rather then gardens but I don't know the origin.
Basically I've been trying to explain to myself why I can't stand some shit and then on the other end feel the need to revisit some music like I was addicted. Of course I could just call prog metal faggotry as I was doing for ages but what does it really come to?
First point that I made to myself is that there are some aspects of music that when contained in it make it a terrible experience for me and I can't stand it. Examples: out of tune singers in clean vocals stuff, standard three chord harmony in pop music (recycled for the millionth time), the sound of cheap keys in country/folk music, etc etc. On the other end there are some aspects that make me like the music.
A concept that is closest to this is negative and positive selection, a simple idea in breeding of plants or animals for example. Basically you can watch out for some negative attributes and throw out shit that contains them (negative selection), or look out for positive attributes and keep shit that contains them (positive selection). I know it's simple but it's the closest I got to describe the process of how my mind subconsciously decides what I like, or even how I could learn to deliberately imitate it.
Another thing that I heard mentioned during some gardening lecture (laugh all you want), is the idea of "three perceptions", which are the following:
(1) sensation delight
(2) delight from imagination
(3) delight from understanding
I immediately thought I could apply those on perception of music. (1) Omg the sound on this Ildjarn record, (2) the things that my mind creates as a reaction to the music - maybe some feelings and memories connected with the song or its individual melodies, lyrics, etc, and (3) understanding how the music was written, what it was inspired by, how to play it perhaps, etc.
I feel like the first two are kinda emotional approach and the third one is somewhat technical and I immediately thought of certain people that lean towards the former and some that put more emphasis on the latter. There are people like mom who would never read sheets while listening to music and says that the only thing that matters is what it sounds like and what it makes you feel, and then there are more technical listeners who would go for contemporary music and study serialist tone rows and spectralist tone clusters and have the delight from understanding something that the first group wouldn't consider beautiful at all.
And then there are people who stick cucumbers up their asses. I need to go but I might add some more rambling later.
Phone edit: I realize the idea of three perceptions probably was about art in the first place, rather then gardens but I don't know the origin.
Last edited: