RATE WHAT THE PERSON ABOVE IS LISTENING TO THREAD

I liked that quite a bit. I really need to explore the shoegaze genre. 7.5/10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
5/10
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luK3-XUYKw0"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luK3-XUYKw0[/ame]
 
4/10 started off promising, but then seemed to drag on and bore me to tears.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was expecting that song to go full-out homocore with that introduction, but it wasn't bad. Melodramatic and cheesy, but pretty listenable. M-A says their early stuff was progressive thrash; can you confirm/deny? 5/10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was expecting that song to go full-out homocore with that introduction, but it wasn't bad. Melodramatic and cheesy, but pretty listenable. M-A says their early stuff was progressive thrash; can you confirm/deny? 5/10.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRPQtnba4NU

I don't care how sweet your drummer is, if all your riffs are video game retreads and your 5 minute song really only has two chord progressions, your music is going to be boring. 3/10

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The main riff is way too generic and over repeated, although for 1992 I guess it's not as generic as initial judgment decreed. Gets much better half way through; sounds more like a two minute song repeated twice with some spiffier noise rock stuff towards the end. I like the style, but they either tried too hard or not enough with that song. 4.5/10.

 
Last edited by a moderator: