- Oct 28, 2009
- 204
- 0
- 16
So I met this older band the other day, that play kind of old-school hard rock, and offered to record a demo them for basically free (I need the practice, they need a recording). They don't have much money, and neither do I, so my setup is limited to basically a line6 toneport, 2 mics and modelling/sample software.
For the guitarist, bassist and singer, there isn't a problem, but as soon as I mentioned the word "drum samples", the drummer basically said "No way in hell am I to be replaced with drum samples".
Now, everyone else in the band is okay with it, since I'm doing it for free, but the drummer apparently doesn't realise that recording physical drums is a very time-consuming, expensive process, and that just using samples will provide much better results in much less time for a lot less money.
The recording would be just for a demo tape to send out to get gigs, nothing that they would actually sell.
My question is, do you think the drummer's objection is reasonable? Is it fair to go the cheap and easy way, or would you yourself also be against being recorded this way?
For the guitarist, bassist and singer, there isn't a problem, but as soon as I mentioned the word "drum samples", the drummer basically said "No way in hell am I to be replaced with drum samples".
Now, everyone else in the band is okay with it, since I'm doing it for free, but the drummer apparently doesn't realise that recording physical drums is a very time-consuming, expensive process, and that just using samples will provide much better results in much less time for a lot less money.
The recording would be just for a demo tape to send out to get gigs, nothing that they would actually sell.
My question is, do you think the drummer's objection is reasonable? Is it fair to go the cheap and easy way, or would you yourself also be against being recorded this way?