So I hear the 'new' Superman flick is supposed to be complete pants

Krigloch the Furry-ass said:
Superman was cool, wasnt boring. Brandon Routh did an excellent job.
my only complaint is that the bad guy is luthor. If they make another one I hope its against someone that has a chance to beat his ass. like Darkseid or some shit.

I thought it was completely uninspired, and dead boring.
And his costume still sucks.
And how in God's name did nodoby in that movie make the connection between the guy they see EVERY DAY and SUPERMAN, who is on the front page of their papers everyday? What kind of dumbass journalists are these? The only difference was no glasses, and that curl of hair... I JUST DON'T GET IT!
 
J. said:
im a huge superman fan, and i dont give a shit about this movie. Christopher Reeve will always be Superman, just like CHristian Bale will always be Batman.

I wanna see Lady in the Water because it probably has a surprise ending!!!!

Christian Bale is awesome, but you're forgetting the mighty Adam West.
 
A friend of mine was throwing something into a trash bin the other day and started laughing. I asked what was so funny and he said "I thought I just saw a picture of you in the garbage there." I went over to look and it was a picture of the new Superman. First I have a friend that thinks I look like John Cusack and now this? I don't know what these bastards are smoking.
 
i dunno. i found him to be a bit creepy in that. like one of those annoying precocious children a la dakota fanning
he rules in american psycho though. i became gay for a few minutes after watching that.
 
pants = rubbish

bear in mind, pants in England does not mean trousers. pants are what you wear under your trousers. You know, like boxers, y-fronts (briefs), and leopard skin thongs.
 
"trousers", thats something a grandpappy would say. like calling pants "drawers"

"y=fronts"?? it's all just underwear at the end of the day