SoundsLikeFog
Member
- Oct 16, 2012
- 166
- 1
- 16
you called BS but essentially said the same thing. digital is a more transparent and a cleaner signal representation of sound. i never said it's "better." i myself don't even think it's better. i just said that there are plug ins that not only replicate individual gear but also the entire chain from channel strips to summing to tape machine. how close they get? a little close. but it will never be the real deal. you're always going to have an imitation which will never capture the real thing. but the op just asked to understand how all of this gets used and how he can use his plug ins.
We are allowed to answer and comment other posts besides OP, right?
And no.. I didn't say the same thing you implie. Or then we have huge misunderstangings considering the terms "transparent" and "clear". The medium which loses information can't be more transparent and clear than the format which is capable of recording and storing the whole spectrum of the recording at hand..
It's not about something that analog adds compared to the digital medium. It's about what digital fails to capture.
E: My point wasn't to attack your post nor did I mean to imply that you think digital is superior. I just wanted to point out that the common misconseption of 'digital perfectness' is bullshit.