The draw an Opeth song game.

[SeanNZ]

wwallinga: Harlequin forest

Some of these are brilliant, keep it up

 

[wwallinga]

Thanks. The trouble is, we're running out of titles. Most of the easy ones have been done, and I just can't figure out how to do the others. Maybe I'll scan the lyrics and try something there.

 

[worldwide_suicide]

to rid the disease (?!)

 

[FRUGiHOYi]

Thanks. The trouble is, we're running out of titles. Most of the easy ones have been done, and I just can't figure out how to do the others. Maybe I'll scan the lyrics and try something there.

you can use the same song more than once...

 

[MrJack]

yeah, but using the same gets boring. specially for the amen corner!

 

[wwallinga]

Okay, try this one. I can't tell you who the guy is - he's a deceased famous singer. If you ever watched the show Night Court, you'll know him.

 

[SeanNZ]

Mel-in-da!

I did some googling to find the singer, Mel Torme

 

[wwallinga]

Face OF Mel IN da

 

[SeanNZ]

heh, close... i should of got that

 

[opeth_353]

This one shouldn't be too hard...

YOU BASTARD.. YOU ABSOLUTE BASTARD hahaha!

you nicked my idea you did!

to RIDE the disease!

 

[wwallinga]

OH... I get it...

If I had paid attention to the Cholera thing, I probably would have gotten it earlier... Oh well.

Nice job!

 

[wwallinga]

Okay - you'll need to have taken Integral Calculus (!) to get this one...



Any takers???

 

[Kenneth R.]

+natural log (x)+C ?

 

[wwallinga]

Well, while you're struggling with that one, try this one...

 

[Kenneth R.]

not struggling it just doesn't make any sense or the reference is really, really abstract.

 

[wwallinga]

Okay - you were close enough, so I'll tell you. The integral of 1/t is ln(t). But you have to evaluate that at x and 1. So you get ln(x) - ln(1). Since ln(1) is zero, the final statement is +ln(x).

+ = PRO
ln(x) = LOG (LOGUE)

Too abstract???

 

[Khayman666]

wwallinga: Bleak.

 

[Kenneth R.]

i wrote the 'answer' right.

however + as "pro" and "ln" as log is too abstract, yes.

if you wanted to make it more related you should have done one that came out as log instead of ln. but in any case, math though useful is largely stupid anyway and these initially fun puzzles have gotten rather ridiculous.

 

[wwallinga]

i wrote the 'answer' right.

No. There's no constant.

but in any case, math though useful is largely stupid anyway and these initially fun puzzles have gotten rather ridiculous

You sound like the fox and the sour grapes.

 

[SeanNZ]

Omg that integral one is hard! I use calculus everyday and i still dont see it

EDIT: seems you answered it while i was thinking. It all makes sense now. Seriously good stuff