Stupid imo. Btw, the Iraq war has been over for quite a while now.
So why do we need to have a military presence in places where there isn't a war?
To keep the peace, to prove to those countries that we will keep our word and protect their freedom and future prosperity, to show the world that we mean business when it comes to spreading democracy and that we don't fuck around, etc etcet teccetetec.
Besides, last I checked South Korea and Germany are doing pretty damn well for themselves, just as I suspect Iraq and Afghanistan will, eventually.
Vietnam is a different story obviously. Can't win 'em all I guess.
To keep the peace, to prove to those countries that we will keep our word and protect their freedom and future prosperity
to show the world that we mean business when it comes to spreading democracy and that we don't fuck around
To keep the peace, to prove to those countries that we will keep our word and protect their freedom and future prosperity, to show the world that we mean business when it comes to spreading democracy and that we don't fuck around, etc etcet teccetetec.
Besides, last I checked South Korea and Germany are doing pretty damn well for themselves, just as I suspect Iraq and Afghanistan will, eventually.
Vietnam is a different story obviously. Can't win 'em all I guess.
zabu of nΩd;9644826 said:Seriously, what the fuck is that thing![]()
Britain going to war with Argentina, against the wishes of the U.S.A. did more to spread democracy there. I know that might be an offensive thing to say but it's true.