I don't get how people can think they know what a band is trying to achieve. As far as I'm concerned, basing any part of your evaluation of a band's music on whether they've failed to achieve their "vision" - even if they've explecitly stated the parameters - is a cop out, plain and simple. Hate them all you want, but why not hate them for what is there as opposed to being so fanciful about it?
First of all, I'm an English Major, so that's my job.

Secondly, it's not like their motives and their intentions are so incredibly masked that nothing could be reasonably inferred. I mean, they have a 34392 page long biography on their page and lyrics to everything, which reveal an incredible amount of information about the band and the band's motives that I don't think what I said was at all unjustified.
Also, I don't think I've ever said that I hate them, and if I did, it was for exaggerated effect. The reality is that I don't hate the band, and I don't dislike the band, though I find some of their work to be bordering on unlistenable, namely Voice in the Wind, which seems to be a cover. But there are and will probably always be glaring shortcomings for me, particularly the generally poor utilization of keyboards, the guitar being in the background too much, and the lack-luster vocal performance (particularly on Sorrow of the Angels). Though from what I understand, remasters are planned for both albums, so maybe some of this may be fixed in the future.
However, like I said in RC, I'm giving the band a second chance. This time with Sorrow Of The Angels. It's been a good while since I've listened to this album, so most of my criticism stems from an evaluation of Of Empires Forlorn. For the sake of the band, I'm hoping this album is better (and in fact I do remember it being better). We'll see what happens. Either way, however, I highly doubt that I will ever come to praise them as an incredible band or among the best Doom Metal bands of today, which most people seem to do.