narcossintese
Member
"The admissions of the son started with blanket denials, then minimization, to moments before his death an admission of vaginal rape,"
With a gun pointed in my head I would admit that I killed the dinosaurs.
"The admissions of the son started with blanket denials, then minimization, to moments before his death an admission of vaginal rape,"
More than a thousand mourners gathered for the youth's funeral Nov. 23 at Second Ebenezer Church where Bishop Edgar Vann II declared "absurdity has become normal" in the area. He asked residents to rally against violence.
Deborah Jenkins, principal at Martin Luther King Jr. High School, where Pinkney Jr. had been a sophomore, described a generous and kind young man.
With a gun pointed in my head I would admit that I killed the dinosaurs.
One thing I'd like to know though, which isn't made clear in the article: How was it discovered in the first place? Did he go to tell his mum on his own account or after he was caught/it's been discovered?
I just read it again... and no, I don't think it's being made clear how it was discovered at first.
fuck, I voted the wrong option too. Why isn't the poll question the same as the topic title?
Am I the only one who sees that the ,,filthy rapist,, was kid himself? Jesus Christ, just a fucking KID. Kids are fucking called kids because they have fucked up ideas now and then, some are more fucked up than others, those who actually bothered to read the whole thing know there was no evidence for actual vaginal rape, the 15yo propably had no big clue what the fuck he was doing anyway. What the father did to him was fucking sick, the kid understood he did wrong, begged for forgivenes and was humilated and shot like an animal afterwards. What the fuck is wrong with some of you, THE ,,FATHER,, SHOT HIS FUCKING 15yo KID LIKE A FUCKING ANIMAL! THE KID WASNT 30 YO CHILD PORNOGRAPHY FAN, HE WAS A FUCKING CHILD HIMSELF! How can anyone even try to justify what the ,,father,, did?!
I'm not even voting in this shit cause i find it disgusting to even have the option to justify the father action there. If the murdered one wasnt kid that would be WHOLE DIFFRENT story tho.
Yes, he was 15, but I sure as hell was self aware as a fifteen-year-old to know that rape and sexual assault is wrong. It's not like the kid was a deaf, dumb, and blind vegetable.
If he was mentally ill, that's one way of explaining it...but none of us will know for sure. If he wanted counseling then I think it's a good chance that he had some fucked up fantasies and whatnot.
Did he deserve to be shot in the head by his father, no.
Do I believe he was a totally innocent child, devoid of free will, and simply submitting to his impulses as a poor, defenseless, confused child? hellll no.
-Joe
I'm not trying to justify what the kid did. What I'm saying is there's subtle diffrence between filthy disgusting dude in his 30s that would do that to satisfy his sexual needs and a stupid 15 yo who just had retarded idea, I know how stupid 15yo can be. We would have to make another holocaust if we were to deny every youngster with stupid ideas. Again there was NO evidence of vaginal rape.
Of course, it's wrong as fuck and everyone is entitled to their opinion, we are not the ones to judge him anyway, no one is - he's dead. But beign on the father side in this particular case... well what can I say, the guy who was able to do this was propably child abuser himself. I can only imagine him beating up his family on a regular basis. Remember, it's scum like him that is making innocent into one of his kind. What the guy did is the ultimate disgust that could ever happen, if the judgements were to me him I'd make him bathe in acid for what he did...