converters

Mixes as a whole? Probably 6-7, and that's being generous...you have a Fireface now, right? Andy and James use the stock converters in the Digidesign 192 i/o, and I doubt those are any better (maybe even a bit inferior) to the Fireface's, so there are PLENTY of other places to spend your money. If anything, I'd say just get a 2-channel A/D converter (Benchmark makes pretty much the best from what I've heard) for key instruments and leave it at that.
 
I don't think converters are gonna give you a better mix necessarily. You might get a better sound when tracking instruments and make things easier. I think mic placement mic pres and instrument sound itself and just knowing how to mix properly are way more important.

I'm sure some will differ with my opinion...
 
ok, thanks for the replys...in this moment I have my maudio 1814, but I wait for a fireface at the end of this month.....
 
This is arguable but to me the difference between decent and great conversion is probably one of the smallest qualitative differences in the gear chain. Mics, preamps, room, monitors & monitor controller (yea, seriously) in almost all cases amount to a much larger difference in sound quality.

You'll find so many people at the high end saying the usual 'RME is brittle, cold, harsh. Mytek, Lavry, Benchmark, Lynx, Prism are more 3d, more defined image blah blah' but seriously with the sort of monitoring and recording techniques many of the home studio guys here use, it doesn't matter in the slightest. It might account for 2% difference in their work, if they can even hear it.

The amount of money from decent (read: not shit) to great conversion is simply the epitome of diminishing returns.
 
Furthermore, this is dense metal/rock mixes we're talking here; the only place I can see it being even remotely noticeable is in entirely acoustic music with a HUMONGOUS amount of detail and subtlety, such as orchestral stuff.
 
I think, that if you have quality converters, your tracking will be more clear and defined and this aspect will reflect also the quality of your mix....but I'm not shure of that becouse I never have quality converters in my chain
 
Using primarily the RME adi8 and am pefectly fine with them.
for the C2 on the 2bus I'm using Apogee.

sure, I'd like to have a Lavry gold, but for that money there's tons of other stuff to improve before I get one
 
We got at the studio a RME Fireface 800, and both Lynx Aurora and a Mytek converters. The Mytek is obviously better (more detailed, better stereo imaging) but the difference isn;t night and day. It is very subtle and in a blind test , i doubt one would not much of a difference.
 
Man...GearSlutz is full of pieces of shit that talk out of their ass all day long. WHO FUCKING CARES!?!? How about trying to just record some fucking music for once? Instead of talking about the fucking kind of copper shielding in your ASS.

~006
 
Man...GearSlutz is full of pieces of shit that talk out of their ass all day long. WHO FUCKING CARES!?!? How about trying to just record some fucking music for once? Instead of talking about the fucking kind of copper shielding in your ASS.

~006

HAHAHAAHAhahahahahaha, well said man
 
This really opened up my eyes: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gear...5267-lynx-aurora-16-vs-behringer-ada8000.html

So indeed, converters have a very small effect.

I had difficulties choosing a favourite for the first test but on the second I did choose the Lynx, then I flipped the phase on the original (something I've always done on such A/B tests) and heard how closer B is. Having said that, you won't see me spending a couple of thousand euro on a converter anytime soon.
 
Great thread. Seems the deficiencies of the Behringer converter are the very thing that caused a vast majority to pick it over the Aurora. Ahh people... :lol:

There you go. Spend that extra several grand on acoustic treatment and speakers.