Dakryn's Batshit Theory of the Week
- Thread starter Ender Rises
- Start date
Badbird
Never banned
he thinks all presidents(besides carter) of the last 50 years should be hanged for war crimes.
Einherjar86
Active Member
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
Dak
mentat
Lets see. WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, the narco conflicts of the 70s/80s, the "peacekeeping missions" of the 90s, and the GWOT in the 00s. Yep, thats almost every president for the last 90 years.
Kara-Shehr
Member
- Sep 2, 2010
- 3,233
- 4
- 38
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
I hate to say it, but I've begun thinking that W. is actually kinda intelligent. Not wise, no, not at all, but he isn't a complete idiot. He's just simply not fit to be a leader at all, as not only shown by his presidency, but also by his several failed business ventures.
V.V.V.V.V.
Houses Ov Mercury
Kara-Shehr
Member
- Sep 2, 2010
- 3,233
- 4
- 38
In his case yes. When your administration lies to the entire public for the sake of personal and financial gain, yes. When your war's civilian death toll exceeds 90,000 yes. What's the difference between that and genocide?
Bush has always been "intelligent". His entire buffoonish persona was created before he began running for the presidency.
Last edited by a moderator:
Kara-Shehr
Member
- Sep 2, 2010
- 3,233
- 4
- 38
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
Rick James. Of course his stumbling and bumbling was an act, the Repubs wanted to appeal to the unskilled blue collar worker (i.e. white trash). Just like what they've done with the Tea Party (blame everything on Muslims and Mexicans, 2 things Joe Six pack hates and fears). It's funny how in 21st century American politics, the party that uses the rank and file laborer as their base is a conservative party which serves the economically elite, whereas in 20th century Europe, the laborers supported a party of intellectually elite liberals.
Badbird
Never banned
Dak
mentat
Prismatic Sphere
We Carouse
Nobody is fit to be your "our" leader. The problem in this country is precisely this: wanting to be led. One shouldn't. For wanting to be led only attracts one thing: POWERMONGERS.
Doesn't matter whether it's a dipshit George W. or a stuttering freak Barry Obama. They all suck and have no desire to protect your best interests at heart.
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
Saparmurat_Niyazov
Member
Fuck that. It's obvious that the intentions behind wars like Iraq and Vietnam were wrong, but once we're there, it's war. Maybe you have a different perspective as a military man, but I believe that warfare is no-holds-barred, and anything goes. The original intention of warfare was to define a winner, but with rules of engagement and the Geneva Convention, that gets thrown out the window. Now it's perpetual skirmishing without a clear winner, which is far more inhumane IMO than isolated incidences of massacre and torture.
Dak
mentat
I believe it should be no holds barred, but thats if the war is legitimate, which none of our wars save the wars against the british, have been.
Prismatic Sphere
We Carouse
Yet only in a limited, business sense. If the company known as "Government" fails to defend our individual rights and private property, they should be shitcanned and replaced.
We lead ourselves. Either the government is free or we are. There is not and can never be a middle ground.
When we people finally wake up to that concept, look out: REAL HUMAN PROGRESS.
