- Aug 14, 2008
- 4,893
- 0
- 36
Nothing in the whole of creation could inspire me to buy an Oasis CD.
Unfortunately I have.....
I don't know how YOU could lump OASIS into 90s alternative.
Their sound is a lot more "Classic" than that. They could have come out in the 60s, 70s, or 80s, and released the SAME material.
I don't care what you define the DEFTONES as (and yes, I have heard them, and even seen them live once).
There is absolutely nothing "metal" about them.
Sorry.
"Irrelevant" doesn't have their last 4 albums chart in the top 10. "Irrelevant" is the person who doesn't pay attention to what is happening in popular music but somehow has an opinion on it.
How does sand taste, by the way?
They're by no means as "light weight" as an Oasis, Gin Blossoms, or Wallflowers. I would lump them into the same category as a Bush, Chevelle, or Filter.
"Irrelevant" doesn't have their last 4 albums chart in the top 10. "Irrelevant" is the person who doesn't pay attention to what is happening in popular music but somehow has an opinion on it.
How does sand taste, by the way?
@ Aeonic - I have to be honest, I don't pay too much attention to how bands such as this are defined in the corporate media outlets. If you say SPIN or ROLLING STONE considers them metal because of touring with MASTODON, then so be it. Glen didn't move it to the Lounge, so I take it that some do consider them in the metal genre. Just my opinion, but there is no way they should even have the words heavy metal uttered in the same sentence. Same as I feel about A7X or Coheed and Cambria. You can't throw in a guitar solo to an otherwise emo, screamo, hardcore, alternacrap, etc song just so it can be marketed as metal . Well, I take that back. Yes you can and it will score you the cover of ALTERNATIVE PRESS usually. LOL.
You really would need to clarify your definition of "relevant"
When it comes to music, an album in the top 10 does not qualify it as being "relevant". It usually means that said album had a lot more $$$$$ spent on it in terms of promotion and marketing.
...even a band like Chevelle.
No offense but what's with all this internet metal elitism superiority going on here lately? I never said I liked them, nor was I even the first person to bring them up in this thread. If I did like them though, it's just music, christ. lol
No offense but what's with all this internet metal elitism superiority going on here lately? I never said I liked them, nor was I even the first person to bring them up in this thread. If I did like them though, it's just music, christ. lol
I agree it's just music....but seriously?????
I love the latest Smashing Pumpkins disc.
Billy Corgan plays power chords on a Fender stratocaster.
That does not mean I can justify discussing the album on a metal forum.
Get it?
I didn't realize someone else brought up Chevelle, otherwise I would have said the same thing to that person. I saw Chevelle live once. I wish I didn't, and it's not because of metal elitism (in fact, this morning my playlist has included The Reticent, Rihanna and Spyro Gyra, so there), but simply a matter of liking good music versus awful music.![]()
Plus. you know I like picking on you.
No offense but what's with all this internet metal elitism superiority going on here lately?