Prismatic Sphere
We Carouse
Ya gotta admit that if the only thing that doesn't satisfy some fans with their band is the setlist; then things aren't too bad.
Every Russell-era Symphony X is good. I totally understand and don't totally disagree that they've decided to pull out the muscle(song-wise) for this tour.
Yeah, the crowd'll definitely be blown away by those choices. "Wicked" is definitely a killer live.
However, in the future it would honestly be a treat for the SX faithful(at least myself and some others in this thread) to play "The Edge Of Forever" instead of "Of Sins And Shadows"(which is kinda like becoming the Tom Sawyer of SX[which isn't a totally fair comparison as I can actually come up with some bad Rush songs]) or "In The Dragon's Den" instead of "Evolution". Or how about "Pharaoh"? And that's the point. Symphony X have such an immense catalog of truly great songs that they all deserve the moniker of being called a "classic"(except for the 1st album). If repetitive play is what defines a "classic" to some fans; then I'm afraid that that jewel of a word has been robbed of much of its honorable meaning.
To me, a "classic" is a really great song. Period.
And Symphony X has a whole lot of those.
And I don't know about a certain handful of SX fans, but I for one would have no grievances if the band chose to play a setlist of entirely random choices.
Every Russell-era Symphony X is good. I totally understand and don't totally disagree that they've decided to pull out the muscle(song-wise) for this tour.
Yeah, the crowd'll definitely be blown away by those choices. "Wicked" is definitely a killer live.
However, in the future it would honestly be a treat for the SX faithful(at least myself and some others in this thread) to play "The Edge Of Forever" instead of "Of Sins And Shadows"(which is kinda like becoming the Tom Sawyer of SX[which isn't a totally fair comparison as I can actually come up with some bad Rush songs]) or "In The Dragon's Den" instead of "Evolution". Or how about "Pharaoh"? And that's the point. Symphony X have such an immense catalog of truly great songs that they all deserve the moniker of being called a "classic"(except for the 1st album). If repetitive play is what defines a "classic" to some fans; then I'm afraid that that jewel of a word has been robbed of much of its honorable meaning.
To me, a "classic" is a really great song. Period.
And Symphony X has a whole lot of those.
And I don't know about a certain handful of SX fans, but I for one would have no grievances if the band chose to play a setlist of entirely random choices.