fatalforce
Member
Okay, I got a huge answer from Mr. Sengpiel.. I'll try to sum it up and translate it:
The stereo-triangle with its 60° angles as we know it, is basically an empiric result.
Lots of practical experience and experiments just lead to it, it is a median or starting point for placing two speakers in a stereo listening situation.
An angle too wide creates a hole in the stereo image, and placing the boxes too close to each other (and yourself) narrows the stereo image too much. Plus, if you are too near to the speakers, the phantom centre (you know, the one you get when sitting in the sweet spot) tends to elevate. That's because your brain realizes that it has been tricked into the phantom centre. The effect is called "elevation", can't seem to find it in english but I guess it's the same. As a result, the brain locates the phantom centre higher than the monitors actually are.
A dutch guy named "De Boer" made experiments with two speakers in 1940: He placed them 5 meters from each other and himself 5 meters from the line connecting the speakers.. That resultet in a triangle with two 53° angles. Alan Blumlein hat similar thoughts even earlier.
So 60° (30° angled monitor from the listeners point of view) is only a practical, empiric number that has become an unwritten standard. According to him there's no scientific or divine logic behind it.
Wow, great info. Currently suffering from elevation!
I've also make sure I adhere to the rule of thirds. Like the distance from your side wall and your backwall cannot be less 33% when you divide and such forth.