lol well you put it out here, not me. Not my problem. But yeah,it's also not my fault that you make ridiculous personal generalizations against me and that you misread every post on this board.
Aeonic, with this private message:
Disagreeing with you does not warrant your blast.
Agreed. And honestly, I could've said far worse given how many times you've misread what I've said or made some ridiculous generalization.
But I agree, simply disagreeing with me does not warrant a "blast." Last time I checked:
How old are you? Do you own a car, house, business? Do you support yourself, or are you dependent on someone else? I am 100% serious with these questions and am in NO way trying to insult you.
Your comments in this thread are coming off as a teenage punk rocker who lives at home and tries to defeat "the man"
Is not "disagreeing with me. It's you acting like a child, too stubborn to take 5 minutes read what's said here. I never said ANYWHERE that I'm trying to defeat "the man." Where you get that idea is absolutely beyond me, considering all the music industry discussions I've posted in, in total favor of the business and capitalism, utilizing economic tenets, etc. You can't differentiate an objective debate from personal subjective opinion? That's YOUR problem. You deserve every "blast" that's stated man.
Are you saying that any art dealer is NOT a fan of art and is unethical because the market has driven the price of the said piece far beyond what was originally paid for? So, if someone, fan or not, wanted to sell an item, they are unethical if they sell for the "going rate"?...
Does that mean that my company should sell its stocks far below market value, because if we have a high performing quarter, it would be unethical since maybe in the previous quarter the stock was going at half the rate?
No, I am not saying anything I am inciting a discussion about the topic. I have an opinion, but I actually found a few of the vibes and posts here to be rather successful. I definitely had to re-think my ethical standpoint because of a few posts for sure. That's the point of threads like these. If you feel that threatened by the topic that you don't even want to read it, yeah, you need to get a grasp on how the net works.
The only one who even remotely agrees with you is dcowboys311, your partner in crime.
I don't see how it matters, because as I said this is an open discussion and there's nothing wrong with having multiple points of view. Besides the two trolls and the one or two guys that assumed I'm on a soapbox because I missed out on a deal or whatever when in reality I was inspired by a well written article on the matter (and by the way, you would think that this is a valid enough topic when other sites are covering the issue... so why you seem to feel it's "bullshit" is also beyond me-- I like Agalloch, but I don't like them enough to spend 30 bucks on rare vinyl or whatever), I thought the majority of the posts here were really interesting (except for yours, because they were incoherent and were the product of sloppy comprehension of the topic). That said: AngraRules, your buddy Diabolik, Mardoch, rms, dcowboys, kimavir, Orbweaver (at the very least, on the notion of the thread, but maybe not my opinion), and possibly others agreed with me. But I guess YOU can't be bothered to READ the thread to figure that out.
Why don't you take some time off and actually read and absorb what most here are trying to tell you.
How about you read for a change? It doesn't take long, and you actually sound like you know what you're talking about with the new knowledge gained. Give it a try for ONCE please!
This forum isn't your soapbox.
Not sure where you assumed it was.
Well done. I am 100% done with you.
Don't care.