Sin After Sin though.
Sad Wings - none (aside from Prelude)
Sin - none
Up there, sure. The rest are all mostly shit sandwiches or have 2-3 useless tracks at least.
British without no fillers? Wtf. The whole album is mediocre. So funny, man. Even Screaming has 2 shit tracks.
How many albums you omitted? 3, 4? Inconsistency is the word that defines Priest.
Not until 7th son at least. Sorry man, but The Priests are inconsistent even on their best regarded albums.The difference between Priest filler and Maiden filler is that a Priest filler is a fairly un-notable 2-4 minute track, while a Maiden filler is a good 3-4 minute song padded to 7-8 minutes with chorus repetition and pointless introductory bits. Maiden started self-plagiarizing as early as Powerslave, while Priest has done a mostly-good job at avoiding that.
lol what the fuck does this even mean? "a few people love turbo so should change your opinion" Sound like poser language to me. That album is trash and is still widely considered one of their worst albums, regardless if you flip-flop your opinions based on whatever the fuck it is you're talking aboutHey guy with old opinions, people love Turbo now.
Turbo came out in 1986. Compare it to Somewhere in Time or any 80's Maiden album and cry.Nearly every song on Turbo is better than nearly every song on Virtual XI, Dance of Death, A Matter of Life and Death, The Final Frontier, and The Book of Souls.
So? It's 2020 now so that means it's good!Turbo came out in 1986.
Turdo is garbage
Turbo came out in 1986. Compare it to Somewhere in Time or any 80's Maiden album and cry.
What does that have to do with anything? Compare any 70s Priest album to any 70s Maiden album and cry, derp.
Turbo and Ram it Down were Priest's tenth and eleventh albums. Compare them to the Blaze albums, or, better yet, evaluate discographies holistically instead of applying arbitrary meaningless cut-offs.
Did Priest ever had such a period of uninterrupted musical prowess?