HamburgerBoy
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2007
- 15,042
- 4,850
- 113
Since when art is comparable by their order of production instead the time/era that was produced? Music is no exception, the trends, styles, categotization and distinction are given, among other factors, by the context in which they were created, which is unavoidable a part of the art itself, a part of its identity.
Both have some similarities and are, especially, products of their time. Both feature the heaviest use of synth guitars on both bands in their history, following the trend of the industry back then. So, Turbo can only be compared to SIT and viceversa when it comes to both artists.
Up until 1989, Maiden was infinitely better overall than Priest. IM's discography was basically flawless up to 7th son, almost 10 years straight of excellence. Did Priest ever had such a period of uninterrupted musical prowess?
If you want to compare the two albums, sure, feel free, but that's not a statement of consistency over a discography. You're inventing a rubric that conveniently fits your narrative by dicing a potentially-coherent argument into infinitesimal meaningless yet true premises.
In any case, Caught Somewhere in Time is a boring overly-repetitive song, worse than anything on Turbo aside from Parental Guidance. Heaven Can Wait is also pretty ugly with its ham-fisted vocal melodies and another repetitive chorus (though the bridge section is excellent), and worse than anything on Turbo aside from Parental Guidance. Seventh Son is a pretty weak album; The Evil That Men Do is worse than anything on Jugulator, let alone Turbo, and on the whole it has a disturbing lack of meaningful riffs.
"Uninterrupted" is another meaningless and arbitrary rubric; Priest changed quite a bit from album to album, but while the overall run from 74 through 90 was bumpy, it showed a pretty consistent average nonetheless. By contrast, it is widely consensus (though not my personal opinion) that Maiden's 80s albums were great, their 90s albums shit, and their reunion albums mediocre.