Go ahead and sink your teeth into this theory on Iraq.......

Papa Josh

Minister of Propaganda
So, in regards to the invasion of Iraq and the Bush administration's justification of it by saying there was evidence of WMDs, without actually providing credible evidence....

I had basically come to the conclusion that either: a)there is a conspiracy or b)the administration is just plain fucking stupid and really did believe that there was evidence when all of their intelligence was telling them otherwise.
Or, as my wife so cleverly put it, it's A playing B.


However, stepping down from my soapbox, I was sittin' back, watching Nightline and an idea came to me. What if all of this was just a play in the global theatre? I mean c'mon, this document that the Senate Commission presented today comes out at just the right time. By that I mean it's coming out right before Sadaam's trial, what if his huge group of lawyers managed to use this as evidence for the defense to show the world that the Bush administration was criminal in invading in the first place? What if the US was to be found in violation of United Nations law and held accountable?

Go ahead and laugh, but I think it makes for a great subplot for the next season of 24. :kickass:

 
George%20Bush%201.JPG
"Aye-rack is black as pitch, must be full of my pals! BOMB THEM SUMBITCHES!!!"
 
I don't know what tha fuck is going on anymore ... but my feeling is Bush is not even fighting for re-election at this point ... at least he does not seem to.

Looks like his job is done ... invade Iraq, place key people in power positions and give all his buddies a piece of the Iraq rebuilding pie ... and just sit back and enjoy the financial rewards for years to come.

I mean .. the job of being a president is just and inconvenience at this point.

9/11 seems more and more strange at this point ... if Fahrenheit 9/11 has any truth and the Binladen family is buddy buddy with the Bushes ... why was Osama behind the attack? ... things are not making sense for some reason
 
if Fahrenheit 9/11 has any truth and the Binladen family is buddy buddy with the Bushes ... why was Osama behind the attack? ... things are not making sense for some reason
Why it doesnt make sense? Osama's brothers cared to make business with the usa, Osama cared for other things. His brothers and sisters even changed their name after the twin towers thing
 
There was obviously some monumental communication failure between the CIA and the Bush administration, compounded with a flagrant disregard for the evidence being presented and a desire to launch a lucrative war. As for 9/11, I still think Osama is more than just a scapegoat, but no way did he coordinate the attack without cooperation from certain Middle Eastern insurgents, possibly those trying to overthrow the pro-Western Saudi oligarchy.
 
There was an interview on TV last night with one of Osama's brothers. He strongly denied any ties between his family and the Bush's. He also stated that the Bush administration DID NOT give them preferential treatment by flying them out of the US before others were able to do so. He said his family was stuck in the US until 9/20 . . . just like everybody else. In short, he said Michael Moore is full of shit.
 
Nate The Great said:
There was an interview on TV last night with one of Osama's brothers. He strongly denied any ties between his family and the Bush's. He also stated that the Bush administration DID NOT give them preferential treatment by flying them out of the US before others were able to do so. He said his family was stuck in the US until 9/20 . . . just like everybody else. In short, he said Michael Moore is full of shit.
Of course he did, he wouldn't be helping his friends in the Bush family if he said otherwise....

 
Course, it was front page of today's paper. In all honesty, I can only really shake my head and laugh in a "har bloody har" sense at the way it's reported like it's some kind of mild surprise.

I dunno, I give up...
 
Papa Josh said:
What if the US was to be found in violation of United Nations law and held accountable?
How would the US be held accountable? The US is part of the Security Council and has unquestionable veto power, the US funds the UN more than any other country (I'm pretty sure, someone correct me if I'm wrong please), and on top of all that, the frickin' UN headquarters is in New York City!

I'd rather see some treason charges brought up against Bushy than the worthless UN do anything, but it'll never happen. You have to lie about a blowjob to get in trouble as president.
 
Papa Josh said:
What if the US was to be found in violation of United Nations law and held accountable?
NAD said:
the US funds the UN more than any other country (I'm pretty sure, someone correct me if I'm wrong please), and on top of all that, the frickin' UN headquarters is in New York City!
Yep. All that crap that Colin Powell presented to the UN was just lip service. They knew they had shit going in, so did Blair. Remember all those WMD inspectors finding nothing, and yet Bush insisted that they must have missed something. And now, suddenly everyone in the 'intelligence' services is coming out of the closet and announcing that the 'evidence' for WMDs was pathetic.

Where the fuck were these people back when it mattered?

And the UN is a joke. Today, the world court ruled against this fucking BERLIN WALL (or should I say, "wall of jericho", haha - hypocrisy at its finest) in Israel, but nothing will happen. Actually, according to the front page of the NY Times, the only judge that didn't rule against was a yank. No surprises there. Fucks sake. I mean, seriously, if there was one time where an American needed to stand up and rule against Israel and it's actions, today was the day to be heard in unison with the rest of the world.
 
I read this bit a few weeks ago (honestly I have no idea where, possibly http://www.stratfor.com) about how Bush wants to change the entire ideology of US foreign relations to one of this preemptive strike thing. Like a proactive approach, he wants to shift military acts away from UN approval and common decency standards to an active attacking system. Honestly I find this repulsive, but in a few hundred years I'll bet old Bushy might be seen as a great conqueror. Not so much in a positive light, but a Genghis Kahn type of reverence one.

Oh yeah, and Israel + US =
69-lesbian-teen.jpg


Anyone ever been in a 69 and smelled the chick's bung? That shit sucks. HAHA no pun intended!
 
Well, I voted for Blair and his New Labour party. I cannot believe that Britain is on the verge of another Tory government. You had it all Mr Blair, you had the nation on your side, and then you became a sock puppet to a retarded chimp.
 
The failure of the UN to curtail Bush's invasion plans was the ultimate proof of its ineffectiveness, in theory it operates as a safeguard against defiance of international law, but the US has has used it as yet another arena in which to flaunt their status as leading military superpower. And our one-sided treatment of Israel is one of the causes of the whole mess, you can't condemn terrorism yet portray their oppression of the Palestinians in a positive light...

note: I'm not anti-Israel, just anti-prolonged-resource draining-distract from domestic problems-politicially motivated-war.