Good job christians in Oklahoma. =(
- Thread starter SocialNumb
- Start date
drew_drummer
Dancefap
Sorry, but I don't believe a word. You are quoting your friends in every post, not bringing any point from yourself into this, so, no, I don't believe you that.
That's my point - if you think that anyone could actually benefit from her example, you simply don't know enough about her.
Jeff
El_Gato
I love this gain
In fact Teresa de Calcuta, as all christians, was a fierce oponent to pregnancy interruption and contraception in an overpopulated country with aids problems.
They don't accept pregnancy interruption but they promote AIDS transmission (indirectly) and overpopulation (so poverty).
They don't accept pregnancy interruption but they promote AIDS transmission (indirectly) and overpopulation (so poverty).
raybrochill
Member
It's not exactly something I like to spill on the web. Frankly, I don't really give a fuck if you believe me or not, random guy on the internet.
El_Gato
I love this gain
colynomial
Member
Felix Neumann
Member
CatharsisStudios
trcksngsrpbngs
- Jun 25, 2008
- 2,198
- 10
- 38
GarethSE
New Metal Member
- Jul 5, 2008
- 7,595
- 1
- 0
- 33
Why the fuck would he have a reason to lie about that?
I never knew my dad, I guess you don't believe me either? Fuck yerself.
abyssofdreams
knows what you think.
roy22341
Member
So is it okay for me to be an atheist that is against abortion on a personal level? Can I personally view a fetus as a cluster of cells and still find it wrong to destroy it? Can I be personally against abortion but accept the right of others to be pro-choice?
The problem I see with the abortion debate is that it forces us to draw a line where "life" begins in some cases. The fact that the government can arbitrarily determine where this line is should be bothersome to anyone.
Granted I haven't read every single post in this thread, since it seemed like a lot of them turned into "OMG If you're religious you're stupid" or "OMG if you're an atheist you're an ass." For me the jury is still out on abortion, and I think even completely removing religion from the issue still leaves the heart of the debate intact, namely whether a cluseter of cells that is a fetus is considered life or not - and who has the right to determine whether or not to destroy that cluster. Maybe I'm crazy, but removing religion from this debate does not make it any easier.
The problem I see with the abortion debate is that it forces us to draw a line where "life" begins in some cases. The fact that the government can arbitrarily determine where this line is should be bothersome to anyone.
Granted I haven't read every single post in this thread, since it seemed like a lot of them turned into "OMG If you're religious you're stupid" or "OMG if you're an atheist you're an ass." For me the jury is still out on abortion, and I think even completely removing religion from the issue still leaves the heart of the debate intact, namely whether a cluseter of cells that is a fetus is considered life or not - and who has the right to determine whether or not to destroy that cluster. Maybe I'm crazy, but removing religion from this debate does not make it any easier.
Morgan C
MAX LOUD PRESETS¯\(°_o)/¯
That's the whole essence of pro-choice. You choose what you think is right, you don't force that on other people. Its not 'all unwanted babies MUST be aborted and all adoption centres shut down'.
Even if you are pro-life/anti-choice/quasi-whateveryouwanttocallit, banning abortions won't stop them and education is the best way to render them irrelevant.
Jeff
Jeff
TheWinterSnow
Den Mørke Natt
these threads do nothing more than show how incapable theists are in constructing logical arguments but instead make themselves to look like they are completely irrational, ignorant and uneducated. Some extreme intolerant moralfags don't help the situation either who try to absolutely force what they believe as the only correct way.
These threads bring out the lulz
hahaha +1
the whole argument of whether it is moral to judge someone is older than the pope, let those who want to judge, judge and those who don't, well don't. Theists need to stop trying to rule with an iron fist on other peoples lives, due to their moral beliefs. To an Atheist/Agnostic, moral is different from person to person, it is subjective (not objective), and no one has the right to tell another person that their beliefs are wrong regardless of how fucked up you may think those beliefs are, and that goes for both sides, theists and atheists alike.
These threads bring out the lulz
hahaha +1
the whole argument of whether it is moral to judge someone is older than the pope, let those who want to judge, judge and those who don't, well don't. Theists need to stop trying to rule with an iron fist on other peoples lives, due to their moral beliefs. To an Atheist/Agnostic, moral is different from person to person, it is subjective (not objective), and no one has the right to tell another person that their beliefs are wrong regardless of how fucked up you may think those beliefs are, and that goes for both sides, theists and atheists alike.
John_C
formerly Skeksis268
STINNETT
Bad / Nationwide
Of course it's okay. I'm an atheist, and as I mentioned earlier, I am against aborion personally, but I don't think it's a black and white issue.
As Morgan C pointed out - being pro-choice has nothing to do with being "pro-abortion". It just means you don't think it's right to force everyone else to agree with you.
Similar threads
