MajestikMøøse
Membrum virile
I ordered a copy. For only $3 I think it will probably be a good chance I will get entertainment value based on the cover alone (although I did enjoy this one older LotFP issue I have lying about here somewhere).
Demonspell said:Roadrunner should be displayed more prominently, and I don't really equate Candlelight and Relapse with whoredom, but because of the former's cash-in reissues and less than perfect track record and the latter's rapport with deplorable mainstream outlets like MTV, they're not exempt from the shitpile.
Demonspell said:I don't really equate Candlelight and Relapse with whoredom
JayKeeley said:By the way, I'm very intrigued as to why BW&BK are included on the cover....
Honestly I don't remember, I think I just said keep the small labels like Audio Savant and ditch anything else. Somebody correct me on this if they saved RC emailz plz. EDIT: I was just informed that yes I did vote to ditch the big labels last time this issue came up. Shame on you for doubting my integrity, J.J. said:and I want to know what RC writers voted to stay on major label promo lists. I'm sure PJ and NAD voted yes. Erik and JayK, no.
J. said:and I want to know what RC writers voted to stay on major label promo lists. I'm sure PJ and NAD voted yes. Erik and JayK, no.
Jim LotFP said:A writer from Rock Hard actually let loose with this little tirade which sums up my feelings:
"To top it all off, BWBK are becoming ever more hypocritical and many of the same bands they tear down in reviews are still being featured with articles (bowing to label pressure no doubt.....) and Popoff writes the dumbest, most extravagant 'Knuckletracks' linernotes on bands they rip in the mag. It's like, where is your integrity? - Quick to dismiss certain genres almost across the board for being 'mallcore', 'kiddle metal' and 'teen angst' but no balls to be consquentional enough and actually let your mag reflect your superior 'true metal' attitude."
Their cookie cutter, no-depth style of coverage drives me up a fucking wall as well.
JayKeeley said:I just thought there might be something lingering back from the exchange you had with the editor in regards to your issue about "how to write reviews".
JayKeeley said:Blabbermouth serves a purpose. Keeps things buzzing. I don't ever read it, but once in a while, someone makes a thread based on a news update over at that site. A tour schedule, a new release, someone quits the band, etc..
I've yet to read anything by Popoff that even approaches a coherent sentence. How the man has made it as far as he has, without the ability to write beyond a 5th Grade level, is mind-boggling.Jim LotFP said:...and Popoff writes the dumbest, most extravagant 'Knuckletracks' linernotes on bands they rip in the mag.
Jim LotFP said:I don't recall ever getting into it with BWBK's people...
JayKeeley said:I don't know what I'm thinking of then...I just went and skimmed through my pile of LotFPs and couldn't find anything. The discussion went into the fact that labels use promos as tax write-off's blah blah -- ring any bells?
JayKeeley said:- which edition has the "Hymn to Life" review? I've only read Jens Johansson's response, but never found the review.
JayKeeley said:- what have you got against Bolt Thrower? I thought John Peel did a fine job helping to unearth those guys.
JayKeeley said:- which edition has the "Hymn to Life" review? I've only read Jens Johansson's response, but never found the review.
Jim LotFP said:Bolt Thrower after IVth Crusade is just boooooooooring, booooooooring shit.