Just a great, stand up character. Articulate, well-read, and actually puts some good ideas into his platform.
Oh and he's probably got the best / only resolution to Iraq at this point. At first I thought it was lunacy, only because the region could turn into another Israel with some form of appartheid running rampant, or even a massive square "carve up" dissection a la Africa fuck up, but the analogy with Bosnia has me thinking now....
Here's an excerpt,
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The first is to establish three largely autonomous regions with a viable central government in Baghdad. The Kurdish, Sunni and Shiite regions would each be responsible for their own domestic laws, administration and internal security. The central government would control border defense, foreign affairs and oil revenues. Baghdad would become a federal zone, while densely populated areas of mixed populations would receive both multisectarian and international police protection.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Decentralization is hardly as radical as it may seem: the Iraqi Constitution, in fact, already provides for a federal structure and a procedure for provinces to combine into regional governments.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Besides, things are already heading toward partition: increasingly, each community supports federalism, if only as a last resort. The Sunnis, who until recently believed they would retake power in Iraq, are beginning to recognize that they won't and don't want to live in a Shiite-controlled, highly centralized state with laws enforced by sectarian militias. The Shiites know they can dominate the government, but they can't defeat a Sunni insurrection. The Kurds will not give up their 15-year-old autonomy.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Some will say moving toward strong regionalism would ignite sectarian cleansing. But that's exactly what is going on already, in ever-bigger waves. Others will argue that it would lead to partition. But a breakup is already under way. As it was in Bosnia, a strong federal system is a viable means to prevent both perils in Iraq. [/FONT]
I mean, what else have we got? I think this is the ONLY way to go to be honest. Surely even Republicans can't still be thinking that we "stay the course" blah blah.
Let's face facts -- we fucked Iraq and now we've got to regionalize it, no?
Oh and he's probably got the best / only resolution to Iraq at this point. At first I thought it was lunacy, only because the region could turn into another Israel with some form of appartheid running rampant, or even a massive square "carve up" dissection a la Africa fuck up, but the analogy with Bosnia has me thinking now....
Here's an excerpt,
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The first is to establish three largely autonomous regions with a viable central government in Baghdad. The Kurdish, Sunni and Shiite regions would each be responsible for their own domestic laws, administration and internal security. The central government would control border defense, foreign affairs and oil revenues. Baghdad would become a federal zone, while densely populated areas of mixed populations would receive both multisectarian and international police protection.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Decentralization is hardly as radical as it may seem: the Iraqi Constitution, in fact, already provides for a federal structure and a procedure for provinces to combine into regional governments.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Besides, things are already heading toward partition: increasingly, each community supports federalism, if only as a last resort. The Sunnis, who until recently believed they would retake power in Iraq, are beginning to recognize that they won't and don't want to live in a Shiite-controlled, highly centralized state with laws enforced by sectarian militias. The Shiites know they can dominate the government, but they can't defeat a Sunni insurrection. The Kurds will not give up their 15-year-old autonomy.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Some will say moving toward strong regionalism would ignite sectarian cleansing. But that's exactly what is going on already, in ever-bigger waves. Others will argue that it would lead to partition. But a breakup is already under way. As it was in Bosnia, a strong federal system is a viable means to prevent both perils in Iraq. [/FONT]
I mean, what else have we got? I think this is the ONLY way to go to be honest. Surely even Republicans can't still be thinking that we "stay the course" blah blah.
Let's face facts -- we fucked Iraq and now we've got to regionalize it, no?