Interesting post about the Varg/Euronymous story

batmura

Sea of Tranquility
Nov 1, 2001
2,828
4
38
www.seaoftranquility.org
I found this on the Meshuggah forum. It's an interesting read.

From http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/the_lords_of_lies02.shtml

'In 2005 I published an article called "Euronymous" (in "A Burzum Story"). I did this in an attempt to stop all the lies and false rumours put out by journalists, reporters, my enemies, my "friends" (!) and indeed even by the legal system in Norway. I heard dozens of different theories regarding the "true" reason why I ended up killing Aarseth, and they were all nonsense.

In early 2006 the department of justice was supposed to consider my application for a release, and "by chance" the press in Norway, at the exact same time, decided to write about this "Euronymous" article, and told their readers that I was "bragging" about the killing. They also interviewed the prosecutor in my case, who according to them said that my story was "new", "different" from my 1994-story and "not correct".

They seem to forget about the fact that I described the killing of Aarseth in "Vargsmål" too, a book I wrote in 1994 and published in 1997. All those who have read both this (poor) book and my article about "Euronymous" will know that my story has been the same all the time, and I think the prosecutor must have mistaken his 1994-theory for the truth. Well, I'm sorry to say so, dear prosecutor, but Your theory was nonsense.

My story is the truth, but of course I can say that a million times and it won't change anything. So I have decided to instead publish a letter I received from a former friend of Aarseth, after he read my article. For now he insists on being anonymous, because he fears media-prosecution, so I have blacked out his band's name, a date and his signature.

The letter is in Norwegian so I have translated it into English to help the reader understand what he says. Enjoy:

"Varg,

I have never met you, i.e. I know you played in Old Funeral when you were support for [band name] in Bergen in [date]. You probably peripherally know who I am anyhow.

I have for a long time had my suspicions regarding the real reasons why you killed Aarseth, but a light was turned on when I read what you had published on Burzum.org. I was touring with Mayhem last spring and heard a version of this from Jan and Jørn backing your story. They were also tired of Aarseth at the time. I remember I withdrew from the milieu the summer of 1993 because of all the commotion in the media with the church fires et cetera. I met Aarseth in a pub in Oslo and he said he wanted (or "had in mind") to get rid of you. I also know that you had a good reason to feel threatened because he had gotten rid of people before with poison and so forth. I remember this especially well nowadays because I began writing a book about my own 90ies and the memories are coming back to me as I write the script. I don't know why I am now writing to you, but I guess it's an attempt to work myself out of everything that happened. A darkness clouds my own memories from 1986 to 1993 that I work on here. I now understand much better than I did then about how we all were deceived into a sphere of lies through Aarseth's philosophy about how the scene should be like.

All of this are things I hope no young ones today are bothered to be deceived into. I am pissed when I remember all the idiotic things Aarseth had in mind.

Good luck with the rest of your time in prison and just be aware that we who know more than the media version will hardly blame you for anything when you get back out.

With friendly regards,
[name]
[e-mail address]"

The letter speaks for itself, but I guess I should explain what the author means when he says Aarseth had gotten rid of people before, with poison. He refers to something that happened in (I think) 1990, when Aarseth according to himself poisoned a Polish guy (I think with arsenic) because he "got tired of him". He carefully claimed, in 1991, that the Polish guy had become very ill and because of that "finally" returned to Poland, where he died after two or three months.

Aarseth was a notorious liar, so I don't know if this is a true story, but that's what he (and the other Mayhem guys) told us anyhow.

In addition to this I wish to add that Aarseth was a convicted felon. He had a conviction for aggravated assault, because he once injured two guys with a broken liquor bottle in a fight on a bus stop. He was not a very nice guy, and obviously I had my reasons to fear for my life when he decided to "get rid of" me. He planned to murder me.

I'm not "bragging" when I speak about the killing. I'm just trying to defend myself against the lies and false rumours. This is my right, in fact it's a human right, and I expect that even the most petty, degenerated and retarded journalist scum out there respect this.

Why don't You interview Aarseth's former friends instead, Jan-Axel Blomberg and Snorre W. Ruch and others, who can all confirm my story and tell You that I have been right all the time?!

I was falsely convicted in 1994 (and 1998 too for that sake) and the journalists in Norway know it. But they're all Judeo-Christian or Socialist extremists and I'm a Pagan/Nationalist, so…'

I wonder who this mystery person is!
NP: Red Circuit - Trance State
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seance
I hate him for ruining both bands(Mayhem and Burzum) with that whole fiasco. I dont know if any of it is true but I wish it hadn't happened.
 
It's funny how he still sticks with his "I was falsely convicted" shtick. Last time I checked it is not legal to kill someone else just because you think (or even know for sure) that they are planning to kill you. Especially when there is little to no evidence to back that up. You'd think a psuedo-intellectual like himself would be atleast smart enough to grasp and come to terms with that.

He made some amazing music in the past, but he needs to stop talking about his past. Or about anything, really.
 
CAIRATH said:
It's funny how he still sticks with his "I was falsely convicted" shtick. Last time I checked it is not legal to kill someone else just because you think (or even know for sure) that they are planning to kill you. Especially when there is little to no evidence to back that up. You'd think a psuedo-intellectual like himself would be atleast smart enough to grasp and come to terms with that.

He made some amazing music in the past, but he needs to stop talking about his past. Or about anything, really.

no no. his original story was that he went to euronymous' place to discuss it due to those rumours, and then euronymous went for a gun, so varg killed him. THAT is his plea for self defense...not that he "heard" that euryonymous' was going to kill him so he decided to beat him to the punch straight away.

not debating if it is or isnt true...just stating the facts he originally claimed.
 
I remember from his interviews in Lords of Chaos he described his actions as a "pre-emptive strike". Though admittedly I don't remember the details all that well.
 
"When I was convicted I got 21 years, the maximum penalty in Norway, and the judge claimed I had "an incomprehensible motive" for killing him. It is really that hard to understand that I killed him when I knew he had plans to torture me to death and then attacked me in the apartment? What part of this is it the judge didn't understand? Initially it was self-defense, but when he started to flee I was no longer in a life-threatening situation, so at that point it was no longer self-defense, but voluntary manslaughter, and as I saw it a pre-emptive strike, to prevent him from getting a second chance to kill me. That should have given me only 8-10 years! Instead I got 21 years, and Snorre got 8 years for doing absolutely nothing!"

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/a_burzum_story02.shtml

That's how it's described on his site now. Since there is, as far as I know, no proof whatsoever that Aarseth was infact planning to kill Varg I don't think it's that weird that the judges didn't exactly go along with the whole "pre-emptive strike" thing (which doesn't hold up in court anyway since that would basically be vigilantism).
 
lol in the interview with euronymous, he said that at live shows , they'd (mayhem) throw impaled pig heads in the audience and dead would cut himself and bleed over the audience.... wtfux
 
CAIRATH said:
"When I was convicted I got 21 years, the maximum penalty in Norway, and the judge claimed I had "an incomprehensible motive" for killing him. It is really that hard to understand that I killed him when I knew he had plans to torture me to death and then attacked me in the apartment? What part of this is it the judge didn't understand? Initially it was self-defense, but when he started to flee I was no longer in a life-threatening situation, so at that point it was no longer self-defense, but voluntary manslaughter, and as I saw it a pre-emptive strike, to prevent him from getting a second chance to kill me. That should have given me only 8-10 years! Instead I got 21 years, and Snorre got 8 years for doing absolutely nothing!"

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/a_burzum_story02.shtml

That's how it's described on his site now. Since there is, as far as I know, no proof whatsoever that Aarseth was infact planning to kill Varg I don't think it's that weird that the judges didn't exactly go along with the whole "pre-emptive strike" thing (which doesn't hold up in court anyway since that would basically be vigilantism).

i remember he had stabbed him 13 times hahaha fucked up motherfucker
 
CAIRATH said:
That's how it's described on his site now. Since there is, as far as I know, no proof whatsoever that Aarseth was infact planning to kill Varg I don't think it's that weird that the judges didn't exactly go along with the whole "pre-emptive strike" thing (which doesn't hold up in court anyway since that would basically be vigilantism).

1. There was plenty of evidence to back up Varg's assertion. Aarseth had a violent history and had made his intention to kill Varg known to several people on multiple occasions - whether he was serious is, of course, hard to tell, as Aarseth was notorious both for his instability and for his negotiable relationship with the truth. Given the circumstances, Varg is probably right - voluntary manslaughter should have been the charge (it almost certainly would have been in the US). The truth is that the fairness of his trial was pretty hopelessly compromised by the media frenzy and the public outrage over Varg's personal beliefs.

2. I find it funny that Varg's crimes are often treated as unforgivable among many metalheads, but Jon Nodtveidt and Faust (whose crimes were, by any reasonable measure, much more heinous) get free passes for the most part.