Master_Yoda77
Juggalo
No, the guy had some stuff come up. He is still pledging a fuckton, he just had to lower his pledge.
No, the guy had some stuff come up. He is still pledging a fuckton, he just had to lower his pledge.
So.... any word on those live recordings?
*bitestonguereallyf*ckinghard*
say what you have to say? obviously you want to say something?
Just not a fan of KickStarter.
I know it's a necessary evil.
i have heard of many where lots of promised items are never delivered.
I have no idea, nor care, why folks haven't gotten their recordings.
Not my business.
I guess my final thought on KS is that if the goal's aren't met, it's always the "Fans" fault for not supporting.
For the record, I did contribute to the KS because Ragnarokkr has meant a LOT to me personally having played it twice (For which I am extremely grateful).
If your project fails to meet kickstarter goals, it could be because a lack of fan support, but it's more likely that your project was inferior and your methods of promotion were lacking. For every project that meets and exceeds budget goals, there's likely ten miserable ones that don't.
it is actually spelled "Totes McGotes"
I can't get behind the Kickstarter idea with bands. First of all if the band believes so much in their work they should invest in it and not depend on others to. So it is fan support; well what if the band puts out a crappy album and these fans basically paid for it. It is going in blindly, and we all know how are favorite bands can produce crap once we think they can do no wrong (Metallica, Maiden. Queensryche, a long list). And if a fan puts money into the product they are now basically a producers for investing, so they should have some say so on the album. And if the fans end up paying for the whole production well now they are share holders so they should be able to make the band then do whatever they want them to.
Kickstarter is just a way to beg for money and hopefully friend people that you can sucker into believing more into your work than you do. If it works kudos and then you can do right by these fans or screw them. If it doesn't work then no harm, no foul, well besides maybe a few people feeling like assholes for getting behind the project.
Kickstarters is good in theory I guess but really it is kind of a scam... well scam might be a little harsh.
If I buy an album I want it to be finished and there for me when I go to buy it, I don't want to be an investor in its production.
Has a band ever offered to give people their money back if the album sucks? Maybe that would be a nice and considerate angle for a band to take. Odds are a band using Kickstarter would never do that since they obviously don't believe much in their project to begin with.
For a fest, I can see the use of KS as a replacement for the whole sponsorship approach.
this is why bands should not release an album for at least 2 years after they form. In this time they should play shows and practice so by the time they get to the studio and record the songs are the best the band is going to get at playing these songs. Too many bands rush to release a demo or Ep after being a band for a few months. The market is filled with crap now.
I don't really agree with that, but I couldn't hurt. Not sure how you went to that from what I was saying either. HAHA
Jamie and I were debating this lastnight, she is for the Kickstarter idea.
because I love making absurd comments
No, it actually wasn't that absurd.
I see your point.
I guess it's debatable on what bands or type of band are appropriate for KickStarter.
Is it the young and hungry band who simply doesnt have the $$$, or should it go to more mature bands who arent selling the amount of units they previously did and no longer get the label funding for production costs as they used to? Is it both? Neither? Who decides??????