M-Powered Pro Tools

Was hoping you'd be the first one to say 'omg, Digidesign have had me testing this for 4 years now, you're all n00bs, lol, bye suckers' */andy logs off to go and record yet another legendary band.*

Umm, so that's a 'no' from my end. Curious to hear the experiences from people that have though. Wonder if it took Digidesign all that much to streamline the interfacing between the m-audio gear with tools.
 
Nitronium Blood said:
Forgive my ignorance, but what was so unique about M-Audio cards that Digidesign had to create a 'special' Pro Tools package for it? :Spin:

Traditionally PT has only worked with digidesign hardware. It is a big deal b/c this is the first time they have supported anything outside of they're proprietary design (Granted they bought M-audio).
 
egan. said:
Traditionally PT has only worked with digidesign hardware. It is a big deal b/c this is the first time they have supported anything outside of they're proprietary design (Granted they bought M-audio).
Oh silly me. I kept thinking about Pro Tools LE, while the discussion in this thread pertains to 'real' Pro Tools software. My mistako. :D
 
Nitronium Blood said:
Oh silly me. I kept thinking about Pro Tools LE, while the discussion in this thread pertains to 'real' Pro Tools software. My mistako. :D
Nope all the proprietary stuff is true for LE too and in fact M-powered stuff uses PT LE. Only PT 'Free' is different (I'm not even sure if that still exists).

Impy:
You can and have always been able to integrate outside hardware into a PT system but you have to have Digidesign hardware. So you can use apogee converters (or any brand with the right in/out formats) or MOTU stuff but you still ultimately had to run it through digidesign harware on the way in or out of the computer.
 
Pro Tools still does not support any non-DigiDesign hardware, because M-Audio is a wholly owned subsidiary of DigiDesign. All this has given us is some cooler hardware options. I don't understand why they feel the need to lock us in at 32 tracks, unless we spend thousands on a high end system. It's a ridiculous limitation that exists for no reason, only to punish the end user.

This is a big reason why I prefer Digital Performer - it lets you use your hardware to its fullest potential, no matter who makes it or how much you paid for it. Track count is relative to your COMPUTER, not your audio interface. I'm not advocating crappy audio interfaces, but right now there is no solution that allows a Pro Tools engineer to have a mobile rig with more than 32 tracks!! It's insane...