- Jan 7, 2002
- 3,859
- 3
- 38
I always thought so...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2007/03/21/nmetal21.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2007/03/21/nmetal21.xml
)Meatl = intelligence (except for some mutants in certain forums I know :Smug:)

ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT?!?!?![]()
![]()
![]()
Researchers found that, far from being a sign of delinquency and poor academic ability, many adolescent "metalheads" are extremely bright and often use the music to help them deal with the stresses and strains of being gifted social outsiders.
The researchers surveyed 1,057 members of the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth - a body whose 120,000 student members are within the top five per cent academically in the 11-19 age range.
Asked for their favourite type of music, 39 per cent said rock, 18 per cent R&B and 14 per cent pop. Six per cent said heavy metal and a third rated it in their top five genres.
The heavy metal fans in the study had lower self-esteem and more difficulties in family relationships and friendships.
Mr Cadwallader then held an online discussion involving 19 members of the academy, 17 of whom were heavy metal fans. They spoke of listening to bands including System of a Down, Slipknot, Tool, Dragon Force, Forward Russia and In Flames when they were in a bad mood and using it to work off frustrations and anger.
One student said: "It helps me with stress. It's the general thrashiness of it. You can't really jump your anger into the floor and listen to your music at the same time with other types of music."
Mr Cadwallader added: "Perhaps gifted people experience more pressure than their peers and use the music to purge this negativity."
Dan Silver, assistant editor of the music magazine NME who has worked for Kerrang! and Metal Hammer, said: "Many themes of heavy metal are about alienation. If you have these kinds of feelings there is a lot you can get out of the music and the community of fans who are into it."
Nice of a bunch of fancy suits to publish facts that most of us -- as heavy metal fans -- have known for years. If they just would have asked us, we could have saved them the trouble of the study.![]()

Given the apparent inability of most people in this thread to correctly comprehend the article, I highly doubt the 'intelligent metalhead' is the norm. The study did not conclude that metal listeners are intelligent, it concluded that intelligent rejects (i.e. 'nerds') listen to angry music to cope with their social shortcomings. Is that really something for a fan of the genre to be proud of?
My experiences:
1) You bunch of freaking no English speaking guys like Wyvern and Carnut. I can remember when both of you struggled with English. Both of you really express yourself so very well in a language that is not your first language now. This board has been great for you two and others. It has even been great for me, because I often try to challenge the non-English first readers with my writing style. I don't use big words people won't understand, but rather use different ways of saying things. My English has improved almost as much as the posters here who are not English-first. The fact that we work so hard to communicate, not only shows our love for metal, but our intellectual abilities.
And if you "highly doubt the 'intelligent metalhead' is the norm" you're hanging out with the wrong people.
Well, I personally don't decide who I hang out with based on the individual's intelligence. That would be pretty shallow, I think.I was an angry nerd (technically an "outcast" before computer days) in 1983 and I listened to metal. And, yes, I'm damn proud of it.
Did I have social shortcomings? Yes. Did I have above normal intellectual skills? Yes. So did several friend of mine back then that are still close friends of mine today (one of them posts here, rokk).
I would much rather have friends like that than someone who starts off a post with, "Given the apparent inability of most people in this thread to correctly comprehend the article".
That is pretentious.
And if you "highly doubt the 'intelligent metalhead' is the norm" you're hanging out with the wrong people.
Why not? 1,000 is enough to get a nice bell curve, and it doesn't sound like they were working with a huge population.Bryant said:1) If you want any kind of accuracy in a study, 1057 participants will not cut it.
Again, you're hanging out with the wrong people. If choosing my friends based on intelligence makes me shallow, then shallow shall I be. I can live with that. Because I have a tight circle of friends that I wouldn't trade for my own pacific island.Well, I personally don't decide who I hang out with based on the individual's intelligence. That would be pretty shallow, I think.
I'm sorry, you've lost me.Trans-Siberian Outcast said:Again, you're hanging out with the wrong people. If choosing my friends based on intelligence makes me shallow, then shallow shall I be. I can live with that. Because I have a tight circle of friends that I wouldn't trade for my own pacific island.