NAMM 2014 Predictions
- Thread starter HOFX
- Start date
Machinated
Member
bendeth has put some stuff on his fb page about a sample library for slate coming out today.
2 kicks, 2 snares, room, reverb, compression channels etc
2 kicks, 2 snares, room, reverb, compression channels etc
Nebulous
Daniel
Caparison have hinted:
Only a few days to go until The NAMM Show 2014, where we will be launching our new model range for 2014. We have five new models including a very special Custom Line 14 model...
Only a few days to go until The NAMM Show 2014, where we will be launching our new model range for 2014. We have five new models including a very special Custom Line 14 model...
haha, thinking about the same thing. i kinde feel that he could make it
real good, but i doubt that this will ever happen tbh :/
anotherpaul
Member
This has never been done before by a number of major companies in their ampsim products!:Spin:
lanky noob
Member
Sometimes I wish that instead of like, texting, you could like, speak into your phone and the other person would hear it, then they'd be able to speak back like straight away, like how wowzers would that be?
- Apr 12, 2012
- 469
- 0
- 16
That'd be rad, dude.
My idea was that, if you look at the redwirez library for example, it could be cut down to a fraction of the size (i.e., one set of microphone capture for each speaker and each position), if you took the impulses then applied the VMS technology, it would give you the quality of a well captured impulse and your selection of mic and preamp. That's progress. Or, in dickhead speak, "wowsers".
And, dawg boy, Slate has a great track record with this stuff, so odds are that it'd be a better implementation than that of major amp sim companies. Would you like me to cite examples to support this?
anotherpaul
Member
Oh, come on, man. Dawg boy? Really?
I meant Amplitube, Guitar Rig, Wall of sound, Recabinet. The concept of software that emulates different mics on the same speaker cab is not new. They vary in quality and in the implementation methods, but it's still software that can represent non-linearities only to a certain extent.
Realistically, I think most project studio owners and home recording enthusiasts (including me), whom I believe VMS is marketed at, won't tell impulse from the real cab and mic in a blind test, let aside Kemper profile from the profiled setup. So this does not even need to be anything incredible technology-wise to sell well.
I respect Slate Digital a lot, their products are indeed great and I would love to work in that team of DSP developers, AND it's a great product, but the announcement was a bit overdramatic IMO.
I meant Amplitube, Guitar Rig, Wall of sound, Recabinet. The concept of software that emulates different mics on the same speaker cab is not new. They vary in quality and in the implementation methods, but it's still software that can represent non-linearities only to a certain extent.
Realistically, I think most project studio owners and home recording enthusiasts (including me), whom I believe VMS is marketed at, won't tell impulse from the real cab and mic in a blind test, let aside Kemper profile from the profiled setup. So this does not even need to be anything incredible technology-wise to sell well.
I respect Slate Digital a lot, their products are indeed great and I would love to work in that team of DSP developers, AND it's a great product, but the announcement was a bit overdramatic IMO.
Come one... you should hear even difference between different deconvolution approaches, not only between real cab + mic and impulses.
For example:
Even with youtube quality...
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
