I can see how this is a "fail" to L.E. users who want to get all the HD features for minimal cost. Unfortunately I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.... it seems like they're actually targeting the "pro" side with these updates rather than trying to include the hobbyists. Maybe that's a smart move... there are tons of pro studios and producers who have spent a lot on HD systems. Keeping them happy and loyal is probably better than compromising their entire hardware/software line just to attract the weekend warriors.
HD I/O: a supposedly significant improvement on the 192 which is already an industry standard... why not? I can see selling my 192 and 96i/o to grab the HD i/o 16x16
OMNI... not really sure what to think of it. Only thing I'd get it for is the monitoring section, but only if it had a remote. price seems a little too steep for that though.
Most excited about HEAT. Analog/tape sim built right into the mixer... awesome! Stoked to try it out, especially with the maker of Phoenix behind it. Listened to the A/B demo and it sounds promising.
The only thing I'm disappointed about is no mention of the rumored unlimited voices in HD. Really could have used that...
The Omni is where I'm most confused about their intentions.
It is $3k which doesn't seem like that much money for what it is,
but, it's only $3k to someone who already has an HD Core card. Why does ANYBODY who already has an HD system need this unit? Whatever system they have now is already more powerful and even if they wanted to sell their 192 and downgrade, they wouldn't get any money out of the deal.
If someone is just getting in to HD, than the Omni is a $10,000 commitment because of the price of the HD card system that is necessary to go along with it. Now, at that price point, why would someone drop $10k on an Omni system when they could pick up a used HD2 system with a 192 for the same price or less?
I dunno, it's pretty baffling.
I don't see how introducing a mid level entry into HD that used Firewire or something hurts the current Pros using the DSP system. If you have a DSP based HD system, you obviously bought it because you wanted the advantages of DSP, so how does something being introduced with no DSP affect your purchase at all?
Seriously, HD Omni with Firewire that had say 18 i/o and only had the bare minimal DSP
on board in the interface to use HD features like input monitoring and ADC for $3k would have been a
huge game changer, and all the real HD guys wouldn't have been affected by it at all, because they would still have far more i/o options, TDM for zero latency plugins when tracking, etc.
Most pro studios are happy with their stable and reliable HD systems, they don't care about what new systems Avid releases because it would be a huge investment to have to switch over. That's why all of those guys are still running 7.4. Avid doesn't need to do
anything to keep those guys happy because they are happy as it is without even upgrading to the newest version of the software, let alone reconfiguring their entire studio with another $20k worth of new Avid gear.
If anything, not touching the HD lineup at all is a better move because it says to the current HD owners, "HD is already the best in the world and you have already made that investment and have the best. We aren't going to continually release improved versions and make you bitter about your purchase while we try and convince you to take out another mortgage to upgrade to our new hardware."