o-m-f-g!

[Wolfman Von Jones]

Ah, that would be a task.

 

[rahvin]

Originally posted by mousewings
The award should be based upon number of posts per day...

here on um the number of posts per day is calculated dividing the nr of total posts by the days one has been signed in. this doesn't take into account the fact that some might have started posting only much later than the day they registered, or might have taken a long break. thus, nobody - that i know - has a postings-per-day rate above 25 even though i'm sure there's ppl actually posting much more frequently than that. this also means i get a meager 9.8 or something, which is undeniably false since i'm a real loser.

rahvin.

 

[mousewings]

True, but a few people from elsewhere (off UM) have about 75 posts per day. They are there all the time.

I believe that is special and deserves... something.

 

[rahvin]

Originally posted by mousewings
I believe that is special and deserves... something.

do they finally win a life?

rahvin.

 

[rahvin]

@hearse: this sounds like the suggestion of a boy aiming for a life-size roll of toilet paper

rahvin. (never asks why)