Dement said:Don't call me noobtits. It makes you sound sexist.
I might as well call you smallpenor.
If there is a true argument with a an absolute winning side (the one everyone but Metal Warth seems to be on), there will be crushing.Opethian666 said:^Lol @ crushing someone over the internet
affinityband said:Metal Wrath!
What on earth is wrong with you..
'Yes they are styles, styles of creating the same subject matter over and over again, my crappy sig is much more innovative than a picture of an apple on a table. Btw, you are shit at proving NFU's point.'
Your picture is not innovative at all. The mondrian piece on the other page is 'pure abstraction'. Mondrian did a similar piece and that was all taken from nature directly. Originally it being a tree. But he wanted to disregard art forms that directly show Objects or forms from nature. It was a daring step for an artist. Your piece is just some artist that has taken something he has seen directly in life and put it into a typical fairy land setting.Innovative...Hell No.
What you stated as 'styles' of art is most definatley not a style..... 'Abstract Cubism Expressionism Fauvism
Impressionism Pointillism Pop Art Postimpressionism
Primitivism Realism Surrealism'
If you want me to Pwn you anymore. Il be more than happy to run to the ground with Pictures quotes and arguments that will no doubt crush you.
daz436 said:because that's even sadder on so many more levels
Opethian666 said:^Haha nah man, besides, I wouldn't care anyway if someone flamed me over the internet. What does bother me is people whose postings simply consist of almost nothing but trying to bring other people and their posts down. Sure, I don't care if they do that to me, but it is annoying and some people do care about that kind of stuff.
affinityband said:Metal Wrath!
What on earth is wrong with you..
'Yes they are styles, styles of creating the same subject matter over and over again, my crappy sig is much more innovative than a picture of an apple on a table. Btw, you are shit at proving NFU's point.'
Your picture is not innovative at all. IMO The mondrian piece on the other page is 'pure abstraction'. Mondrian did a similar piece and that was all taken from nature directly. Originally it being a tree. But he wanted to disregard art forms that directly show Objects or forms from nature. It was a daring step for an artist IMOIMO. Your piece is just some artist that has taken something he has seen directly in life and put it into a typical fairy land setting (WTF???).Innovative...Hell NoIMOIMOIMOIMOIMO.
What you stated as 'styles' of art is most definatley not a style..... 'Abstract Cubism Expressionism Fauvism
Impressionism Pointillism Pop Art Postimpressionism
Primitivism Realism Surrealism' (WTF???)
If you want me to Pwn you anymore. Il be more than happy to run to the ground with Pictures quotes and arguments that will no doubt crush you.
Actually, I didn't choose this artwork for it's aesthetic quality, I wanted to use a phenomenal picture to combat all the shitty nature signatures and frogs, but that has died down now so I will be getting a new signature.Spectacular Views said:metalheads have an absolutely godawful sense of aesthetics, this is hardly anything new. look at how popular travis smith is!
metal_wrath said:AFFINITYBAND!
You are a douchebag. I suggest you save your lame argument for someone who cares. I am simply debating an argument, the only person who is being crushed is you, and your ego, and shit tastes in art. I could care less about Cezanne and his REVOLUTIONARY MASTERWORK painting of apples falling of a fucking table!
Btw, I have edited your post slightly.