People who vote for Bush should be deported

speed

Member
Nov 19, 2001
5,192
26
48
Visit site
Yes, they must be ostracized ( the good old greek way) for the good of the country. At the very least, such idiotic persons voting for Bush should be required to take a basic citizenship test to remain American citizens. I propose these basic tests should include the following topics: American government, economics, finance, and foreign relations/social/cultural studies. If one fails the test, they should be stripped of citizenship for 4 years, and allowed to move to a NAFTA country.

Of course persons voting for Kerry probably couldnt name any reason why, other than he is not Bush.
 
Bush: the candidate most islamic fundamentalists favor!!

Reuters reported in March that an apparent Al Qaeda letter stated that the group supports President George W. Bush's reelection: "The statement said it supported President Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader 'more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom.' ... [The letter added,] 'Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization. ... Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected.'"
 
That's pretty funny.

I still think you people are a little delusional. Bush has a much better chance of winning than Kerry, and it has nothing to do with the IQ of the voter. It's ALL to do with who you feel safer with, and the fact is, people (e.g. soccer moms) feel safer with Bush as Commander-in-Chief.

That's where the votes are coming, and it's nobody's fault that only a third of the population even bothers to vote in the first place.

Put it this way, based on latest opinion polls, it would be a surprise if Bush lost.
 
JayKeeley said:
I still think you people are a little delusional. Bush has a much better chance of winning than Kerry, and it has nothing to do with the IQ of the voter. It's ALL to do with who you feel safer with, and the fact is, people (e.g. soccer moms) feel safer with Bush as Commander-in-Chief.
While I agree with your assessment of Bush's chances of winning, I disagree with your assessment of why people vote for him. I believe that the people who vote for Bush, by and large, are poorly informed. If they feel safer, it's because they're poorly informed. We live in a soundbite nation, where if you repeat something often enough, it becomes true.

Kerry was behind by a wide margin in the three biggest elections of his political career, heading into the final month, and won all three. He was also left for dead during the Democratic primaries, and won huge. Let's keep our fingers crossed that Kerry can domintae Bush in the debates and pull ahead in the polls.

Zod
 
General Zod said:
Kerry was behind by a wide margin in the three biggest elections of his political career, heading into the final month, and won all three. He was also left for dead during the Democratic primaries, and won huge. Let's keep our fingers crossed that Kerry can domintae Bush in the debates and pull ahead in the polls.

Zod
At the same time, do not underestimate Bush in the debates. If you remember, he crucified Al Gore. I watched some of the repeats on C-Span the other day (believe it or not) and my goat, he made Gore look like an idiot.
 
Exactly why these misinformed soccer moms and Hill trash who apparently know nothing of: our government, the basic workings of our economy, history, nor other cultures, should be forced to take a test before they decide the fate of the country- if not the world.
 
General Zod said:
While I agree with your assessment of Bush's chances of winning, I disagree with your assessment of why people vote for him. I believe that the people who vote for Bush, by and large, are poorly informed. If they feel safer, it's because they're poorly informed. We live in a soundbite nation, where if you repeat something often enough, it becomes true.

Zod
Bush Supporters Misread Many of His Foreign Policy Positions

Kerry Supporters Largely Accurate

Swing Voters Also Misread Bush, But Not Kerry

As the nation prepares to watch the presidential candidates debate foreign policy issues, a new PIPA-Knowledge Networks poll finds that Americans who plan to vote for President Bush have many incorrect assumptions about his foreign policy positions. Kerry supporters, on the other hand, are largely accurate in their assessments. The uncommitted also tend to misperceive Bush’s positions, though to a smaller extent than Bush supporters, and to perceive Kerry’s positions correctly. Steven Kull, director of PIPA, comments: “What is striking is that even after nearly four years President Bush’s foreign policy positions are so widely misread, while Senator Kerry, who is relatively new to the public and reputed to be unclear about his positions, is read correctly.”

Majorities of Bush supporters incorrectly assumed that Bush favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (84%), and the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (69%), the International Criminal Court (66%), the treaty banning land mines (72%), and the Kyoto Treaty on global warming (51%). They were divided between those who knew that Bush favors building a new missile defense system now (44%) and those who incorrectly believe he wishes to do more research until its capabilities are proven (41%). However, majorities were correct that Bush favors increased defense spending (57%) and wants the US, not the UN, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq’s new government (70%).

Kerry supporters were much more accurate in assessing their candidate’s positions on all these issues. Majorities knew that Kerry favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (90%); the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (77%); the International Criminal Court (59%); the land mines treaty (79%); and the Kyoto Treaty on climate change (74%). They also knew that he favors continuing research on missile defense without deploying a system now (68%), and wants the UN, not the US, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq’s new government (80%). A plurality of 43% was correct that Kerry favors keeping defense spending the same, with 35% assuming he wants to cut it and 18% to expand it.

Many of the uncommitted (those who say they are not very sure which candidate they will vote for) also misread Bush’s position on most issues, though in most cases this was a plurality, not a majority. The uncommitted incorrectly believed that Bush favors including labor and environmental standards in trade agreements (69%), the US being part of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (51%), the International Criminal Court (47% to 31%), the land mines treaty (50%), and the Kyoto treaty on global warming (45% to 37%). Only 35% knew that Bush favors building a new missile defense system now, while 36% incorrectly believed he wishes to do more research until its capabilities are proven, and 22% did not give an answer. Only 41% knew that Bush favors increased defense spending, while 49% incorrectly assumed he wants to keep it the same (29%) or cut it (20%). A plurality of 46% was correct that Bush wants the US, rather than the UN, to take the stronger role in developing Iraq’s new government (37% assumed the UN).

from: http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/P...ew_9_29_04.html
 
I don't know what I'll do if Bush wins. Cower and hide? Keep an optimistic outlook that things can't get any worse? Hope that Michael Howard wins next year's election so there's a chance things might change on our end? Hmmmm....
 
Ayeka said:
Hope that Michael Howard wins next year's election so there's a chance things might change on our end? Hmmmm....
From what I understand, the Tories are looked upon as a joke these days. I doubt if the conservative party will do much better than the liberal democrats. I think the key change will be Gordon Brown and a continuation of Labour at 10 Downing St.
 
I don't think deportation is necessary, I'd just make the extreme right wingers wear some sort of identification mark so we can point and laugh at them and bombard them with litanies about how detrimental they are to America, let them see what life is like under the watchful eye of the vast right wing conspiracy. Suggestions: a scarlet W, a man rearending an elephant, a bad hair weave, etc.
 
Repetition is where Bush always gets ahead... Kerry needs to bend the debate rules and worry about what the public will think of his "cheating" later. Ask Bush direct questions. Put him on the spot. By being bold, he will show leadership qualities while Bush will look like a coward for not responding.