You know, it's good to see a Bush supporter admit that Bush didn't do so well in the debate. In some of the post-debate discussion, it's clear that some Bush campaign supporters think the man walks on water. Again, I think it would be so much more intellectually stimulating if people could just discuss the debate objectively, and leave their political bias aside. Yeah right, and pigs will fly when hell freezes over.
You know, you could see a debate on whether smoking is good for your health or not, and no matter how strongly one feels about the health concerns with smoking, the pro-smoker could still win the debate just through better debate tactics and simple eloquence. This is the art of debate!
It seems like the debates will target swing voters more than anyone else. I wonder how many existing Bush supporters would 'flip flop' over to Kerry and vice versa as a result of these debates?
Also, Fox being pro-conservative -- no doubt about it. But CNN being pro-liberal? I dunno man...I mean, I compare both those news outlets to, say, BBC America at 7pm each night on PBS, and both seem absurdly neo-conservative in comparison.
