EMG all the way
DiMarzio Tone Zone in the bridge of my Les Paul. I've been rather fond of it ... although I have wanted to try out some EMG's ...
DiMarzio Tone Zone in the bridge of my Les Paul. I've been rather fond of it ... although I have wanted to try out some EMG's ...
i dunno, maybe 'dead' wasn't the right word. Compared to the Duncan Distortion, the EMG81 wasn't warm enough for my taste. The Caparison Dellinger is mahogany (which definitely has something to do with your tone). My Mesa just doesn't like 'em, I guess :shrug:.i've never heard anyone say EMG's sounded "dead" before..... weird.
what a crock of shit. sorry, this type of bollocks about active pickups makes me want to puke.Duncans...all the way. I've used Distortions, the old Seymourizer and Invaders...love 'em all. I hate EMG's...no offense...they don't have character and certainly don't accentuate and instruments individual tonal characteristics. You could put them on a broom handle and they would sound the same.
a Les Paul with an EMG 85 in the bridge and an 89 in the neck is a gift from the gods...... do it.... do it quickly and never look back.Don't kill a Les Paul with EMG's...pleeeeease!
what a crock of shit. sorry, this type of bollocks about active pickups makes me want to puke.
i have the SAME EMG config in several different guitars with different woods... mahogany, walnut, alder... and they all sound different... there is no "loss of character" from using EMG's... biggest load of shite i ever heard.
so are you saying there's a lack of good tone or character in my recorded works??
sorry... you are wrong... .. i don't care if you prefer passives.. hey, tons of people do because they are spongier and cover up some slop in technique, and they have their place sonically.... but don't try to defame EMG's or active pickups in general on some failing of your own to either be able to hear properly or to not be able to deal with the clarity and accuracy of them.
sorry, i don't want to offend you or anything, but you are being pretty offensive with your statments... it's like an assualt on my ability to hear tone and recognize "character".. the fact is that with Actives i hear the character of the wood FAR EASIER than i do with passives, becauses passives are just too spongy.
ridiculous, bass-ackwards, wrong-head, ear-clogged, dogmatic drivel.
carry on.
what a crock of shit. sorry, this type of bollocks about active pickups makes me want to puke.
i have the SAME EMG config in several different guitars with different woods... mahogany, walnut, alder... and they all sound different... there is no "loss of character" from using EMG's... biggest load of shite i ever heard.
so are you saying there's a lack of good tone or character in my recorded works??
sorry... you are wrong... .. i don't care if you prefer passives.. hey, tons of people do because they are spongier and cover up some slop in technique, and they have their place sonically.... but don't try to defame EMG's or active pickups in general on some failing of your own to either be able to hear properly or to not be able to deal with the clarity and accuracy of them.
sorry, i don't want to offend you or anything, but you are being pretty offensive with your statments... it's like an assualt on my ability to hear tone and recognize "character".. the fact is that with Actives i hear the character of the wood FAR EASIER than i do with passives, becauses passives are just too spongy.
ridiculous, bass-ackwards, wrong-head, ear-clogged, dogmatic drivel.
carry on.