This was the particular thread I had in mind. A couple examples:
Maybe you've changed your mind since then.
I don't see what's inherently wrong with taking the devil's advocate, but my point is more to make you realize that you and Helm have/had far more in common with each other than you think, on the subject of the meaning of art. You probably differ in terms of socially-enforced morality, but that's a different point and not fundamentally different from a person saying that one shouldn't take pleasure in LiveLeak gore videos or pedo furry cartoon porn. I don't agree with Helm that there is a significant fascism/right-wing-extremism problem nor that the consumption of sympathetic media makes one susceptible to adoption of said message (except possibly in the case of certain teens/young adults), but a person having a personal moral view that admonishes the consumption of certain forms of media is an extremely common one. Did you have any intent of discussing the content of his blogpost here or did you come here for validation?