No one is worse than the guy who used to narrate for Rhapsody.
Yes.... there's ME !!!

No one is worse than the guy who used to narrate for Rhapsody.
Is After Forever bigger than Primal Fear? I would think PF would be the headliner over AF. But then again I'm not big on them. Nightwish is the only one of these type bands I really love. The others seem like poor copies to me.
It's the same guy ... Jay Lansford. He is the goof that screws up the spoken word parts on Invisble Circles, and is also the guy that used to do the narration for Rhapsody. Christopher Lee is the guy that currently does the work for Rhapsody. He's pretty darn good.No one is worse than the guy who used to narrate for Rhapsody.
It's the same guy ... Jay Lansford. He is the goof that screws up the spoken word parts on Invisble Circles, and is also the guy that used to do the narration for Rhapsody. Christopher Lee is tje guy that currently does the work for Rhapsody.
Britt
Nightwish is the only one of these type bands I really love. The others seem like poor copies to me.
The prog fans will stick around for AF, but not so much PF in the last slot.
You really seem to not know a lot of After Forever if you say they're "copies" of Nightwish... Have you even checked their latest material? It sounds nothing like Nightwish dude, come on now...
l'm an admitted prog head...even extreme to some extent...and l don't see AF fulfilling the prog need. Do they have elements? Somewhat. But, l would never put them in the same classification as Dream Theater, Fates Warning, or Redemption (a few bands whom l think epitomizes the genre). Especially when you throw in the operatic female vocals & the harsh vocals too. They also have power elements, but l wouldn't call them power metal either.
Dude...l hate to break this off in you, but they're alot like Nightwish. Only Nightwish is better...or was with Tarja. But, l like Marco's vocals too and AF doesn't have that good a male vocalist. So, AF is a step down IMO. No offense.
Nightwish is the only one of these type bands I really love. The others seem like poor copies to me.
My sentiments exactly. My cat, Caesar (who likes metal btw) is making this exact expression right now.
This headliner is PRES-POS-TEROUS! Mad bo-gosity indeed...
The Michael
After Forever are a lot like Nightwish? Well, I respect your opinion saying that Nightwish are better (though I strongly disagree), but After Forever doesn't sound like Nightwish at all. The fact that they use orchestrations, classical chois and have a female lead singer doesn't make a band sound like Nightwish. After Forever's music contains different melodies, it's less bombastic, more progressive, more extreme and IMO much more exciting when it comes to song structures and dynamics than Nightwish. Floor's voice is a million times more versatile than Tarja's.
Furthermore, I've seen both bands live and AF beats Nightwish in every aspect. Don't get me wrong, I like Nightwish but AF is far from being just another female fronted metal band.
Floor's voice may be somewhat more versatile, but she still relies heavily on the operatic
Dude...l hate to break this off in you, but they're alot like Nightwish. Only Nightwish is better...or was with Tarja. But, l like Marco's vocals too and AF doesn't have that good a male vocalist. So, AF is a step down IMO. No offense.
Do you really think so? Only the older AF albums contain lots of operatic vocals. Remagine and Invisible Circles are about 80-85 % rock female vocals.
But my point was that, wheter you prefer Nightwish or not, AF are not a copy of them at all. They're a completely different band.
l could use the same elements to point out my preference of NW over AF. Of course Marco's vocals set NW apart in that aspect. l'll take exception with the progressiveness, l don't buy that with either band. Floor's voice may be somewhat more versatile, but she still relies heavily on the operatic and that alone pits her against Tarja & she won't win that battle. l guess we will agree to disagree.