Q for Andy. Peavey Triple XXX

JoshSylosis

Member
May 16, 2005
523
4
18
Reading, Berkshire
www.facebook.com
Obviously everyone elses feedback with regards to recording this amp is welcome. I just want Lord Metals opinion.

Anyways, I just want to know what EQ settings on the amp you'd generally go for. I'm using a string thru ESP LTD (tuned down to C) with the Zakk Wylde EMG set (81/85) and the amp will either be going through a standard Mesa 4X12 cab or the Triple XXX 4X12. For mics I'm using a SM57 along side a Rodes NT2A (I know this is predominantly a vocal mic but still sounds pretty good on guitar cabs) straight into my interface, no preamps. I'm all good with the mic placement side of things.

Obviously a good sound is a matter of opinion, but the reason I'm asking is because the EQ on this amp seems to be very sensative! Too much treble and it sounds like a sizzling frying pan. Too little, and it doesnt cut through enough. Plus it's hard to tell when you've gone overboard with the gain! This amp just seems to respond very differently to a 5150 or recto.
PLUS I'm not able to record at too high a volume.

I know this threads kinda lame and I could just do with spending hours fiddling but I've spent so long using this amp (never having recorded with it) and my ears are maybe too used to its tone. I just dont like too much EQing post recording!

Ta!
 
Yeah man I am curious about this same subject. That active eq really makes that shit a pain in the ass to tweak.
 
ok check out www.audiostreet.net/jamesalexanderboyd

by the time you check there should be a song called 'pop metal' done completely with a xxx head thru a mesa boogie 4x12.

I've owned the 5150 as well and while there are similarities it definately has it's own sound, to my ears the xxx is like a cross between a 5150 mark1 and a mesa rectifier with a touch of marshall twang in there.

for this clip I juiced it slightly with an sd-1 to help with the fizz (pretty much a problem with most hi gain peavey or mesa)

the tight dampening switch was used and the settings were thus-

bass 4
mids 1.5
treble 4.5
gain 3
channel volume 3
master 5

it was miked with one sm57 on axis.
 
well maybe not in the true sense, but the controls are certainly more respnsive than any other amp I've played.

according to peavey the clean channel is passive, whilst the gain channels are active :cool:
 
My advice for eqing the xxx is don't get caught up in what your eq normally "looks like." This may sound stupid or obvious, but most of us tend to start dialling in an amp based on setting for other amps and it just doesn't translate here.

Look at James' eq settings: Everything is below 5 and this has been typical of my experience with the amp as well. If you normally start eq from "flat" (all at 5) try starting at 2 or 3 with this amp and building from there.

IMHO you have to be way more conservative with this amp.....
 
thanks man, it's definately a different animal to dial in.
The tip of having everything on about 3 is a good idea, as to me that sounds closer to an average amp with everything on 5.

if you want a more rock orientated tone put some el34's in there, and use a passive pickup, for metal though use a trusty 81/85 and keep the 6l6's in there.

check out the song 'mr jb maxon' to hear the xxx with a maxon and jb-7 string pickup, it's a more vintage/thrashy sound but works nonetheless.

good luck
 
Yeah, it's nice to be able to have a 3 channel hi gain head with a decent clean (and e.q controls that work :cool: ) without selling a kidney or two.

the only downside is that it has an insane amount of tonal variations so for the anal tweakers out there, it can be a bitch sticking to a sound.
 
someone said this before., but tweak with your EARS not your eyes. that is one of the most critical things in recording. your eyes can play ALOT of tricks on you.
 
axeman720 said:
someone said this before., but tweak with your EARS not your eyes. that is one of the most critical things in recording. your eyes can play ALOT of tricks on you.


Yeah, there's nothing like spending an hour tweaking a guitar track to perfection only to realize you've had your hands on the snare EQ :)
 
thanks matt, that's a heck of a compliment coming from you :headbang:

I use the standard mesa traditional slant, to me it's tighter and more hi fi than than the oversized, but both rock.

the pop metal song is 4 tracks in most parts, the jb maxon song is only two
(just one sm57 on axis for both)

two my ears 4 tracks are kinda over rated unless you have to differing sounds, and even then it's not like it's twice as heavy, just a tad thicker- I'd rather spend that time getting the bass thicker I quess :cool:
 
That's a great sound James. I have been eyeing this XXX that nobody wants at the local music store. I've played through it twice and love it, and I have a chance to get it for $775... perhaps I should...
 
thanks kazrog, for $775 I'd jump on it!!

Get some jj's in there, and you'll be set :cool:

Also if you're still getting the 5150, you could get some great layering going on for rhythms.
 
jamesboyd said:
thanks kazrog, for $775 I'd jump on it!!

Get some jj's in there, and you'll be set :cool:

Also if you're still getting the 5150, you could get some great layering going on for rhythms.

I'm still waiting for my 6505+ to arrive. I ordered it on April 30th, and Peavey has been having trouble meeting demand. I should have it in 2-3 weeks time.