Question about the Waco Jesus page on Metal Archives

vgmaster9

Member
Jun 30, 2012
103
0
16
http://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Waco_Jesus/3482

Right now I'm too scared to click on the albums in because I don't know if there are different versions of the covers for the albums. Are only the covers censored while all the sick shit are found in the booklets? I'm just afraid that there are different covers for the albums and that the pages will have any (supposed) alternative versions.
 
Next time I see Kevin Menssen in Eureka, I'll ask him and see what's up.

But I just clicked on them and only the first 2 have the "uncensored" album art. The other three are pretty tame and only contain some titties and butts.
 
I really don't know why they had to show the uncensored covers. Doing that would just drive people like myself away. It would be perfectly fine just showing the censored covers.
 
Like I said, just showing the censored covers would be appealing to a larger crowd, just my opinion though.
 
I really don't know why they had to show the uncensored covers. Doing that would just drive people like myself away. It would be perfectly fine just showing the censored covers.

Why the fuck are you looking at Waco Jesus if the album covers offend you?
 
Because albums entitled "Sex, Drugs, and Death Metal" are probably all about censorship...

Seriously this thread is like asking "How come when I go to a porn site there are people fucking?".
 
Why the fuck are you looking at Waco Jesus if the album covers offend you?

I only want to see the censored covers. I remember seeing the censored one for Destruction of the Commercial scum.

Because albums entitled "Sex, Drugs, and Death Metal" are probably all about censorship...

Seriously this thread is like asking "How come when I go to a porn site there are people fucking?".

When you have people shitting all over each other, that's where you draw the line.

Look, all I'm saying is that it would be nice if MA just showed the censored covers. The people that actually bought the albums can see them.
 
On topic though, I think gore photo covers are stupid. Especially scat. It's not that I feel sick when I look at them, I just don't see the point.

I don't mind painted gore though, on brutal death metal albums. At least that's art.

EDIT:

Look, all I'm saying is that it would be nice if MA just showed the censored covers. The people that actually bought the albums can see them.

They could put some warning there, yeah.
 
I only want to see the censored covers. I remember seeing the censored one for Destruction of the Commercial scum.



When you have people shitting all over each other, that's where you draw the line.

If you can't deal with seeing people shitting on each other why bother checking out the album ?. It does not make any sense. No one wants to see censored albums. Censorship is bullshit. People shit on each other everyday. I do not mean as in literally taking a shit on someone, but you get my point.
 
On topic though, I think gore photo covers are stupid. Especially scat. It's not that I feel sick when I look at them, I just don't see the point.

I don't mind painted gore though, on brutal death metal albums. At least that's art.

EDIT:



They could put some warning there, yeah.

I'm mostly ok with gore photos as album covers, but having something like the pillowfight pic as cover is going really overboard. I also wouldn't mind painted gore pics, since it's not even real.