Reasons Why....

I voted for Trump so that the poor, illegals, refugees, minorities, gays, Muslims, etc will suffer. At least he is trying and I respect him for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HamburgerBoy
"I voted for the American Hitler so that minorities will suffer". To be honest, American politics right now is such a sick Kafkaesque joke that I'm not even sure whether you're joking or not. But quite frankly, it's pretty obvious that a lot of you foolish little kids around here are not even seeing the bigger picture in all of this: with the decline of the U.S. brought about by it's clownish joke of a president, we're witnessing the rise of China into a position of global dominance. Basically, the world's largest authoritaritarian dictatorship is poised to become the most powerful country, all thanks to some dumb rednecks laughing at Trump-clown's vulgar speeches. *Way to go, guys!*
 
"I voted for the American Hitler so that minorities will suffer". To be honest, American politics right now is such a sick Kafkaesque joke that I'm not even sure whether you're joking or not. But quite frankly, it's pretty obvious that a lot of you foolish little kids around here are not even seeing the bigger picture in all of this: with the decline of the U.S. brought about by it's clownish joke of a president, we're witnessing the rise of China into a position of global dominance. Basically, the world's largest authoritaritarian dictatorship is poised to become the most powerful country, all thanks to some dumb rednecks laughing at Trump-clown's vulgar speeches. *Way to go, guys!*


I was not joking.

Btw the decline of the US and rise of China started long before Trump. Obama was instrumental in it. Trump is trying to turn it around.
 
The rise of China has been inevitable since Deng Xiaoping's reformations. I can't wait for the Chinese to destroy lazy gluttonous Western culture.
 
...Donald trump is destroying the environment:

1. Nominating Scott Pruitt as EPA administrator
Donald Trump will make 'final decision' on Paris climate deal next week

In March, Scott Pruitt infamously said about carbon dioxide that “I would not agree that it’s a primary contributor to the global warming that we see”, in contradiction to climate scientists, including those at his own agency. Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief has deep ties to fossil fuel interests and joined with them on numerous occasions to challenge EPA pollution rules while attorney general of Oklahoma. He has opined that the EPA has become distracted from its core mission by climate concerns and has begin the process of ripping up Obama-era emissions regulations.

5058.jpg

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator Scott Pruitt listens as Donald Trump speaks before signing the Waters of the United States executive order on 28 February. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/AP
2. All change at the EPA
Trump’s proposed budget would cut the EPA’s budget by nearly a third, a move that many Republicans have called draconian. Climate and clean energy programs are earmarked for the scrapheap, with even the data collection process for companies’ greenhouse gas emissions wound down. Climate considerations in federal permitting have been abolished, measures to reduce methane emissions have been halted and new standards to improve fuel efficiency of cars and trucks have been suspended.

4280.jpg

A protester seeks shelter from the rain in front of the EPA during the Science March, in which thousands rallied in Washington. Photograph: Bill Clark/Getty Images
3. Starting the demolition of the clean power plan
An executive order in March demanded a review of the clean power plan in order to remove “regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production”. Trump has repeatedly vowed to dismantle the plan, which aims to curb carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. Several analyses have shown that without the plan, the US will fail to cut emissions to the level pledged at the Paris agreement.

3000.jpg

Donald Trump makes remarks prior to signing an executive order that reversed Obama-era climate change policies. Photograph: Pool/Getty Images
4. Open up federal land and waters to drilling
Congress moves to give away national lands, discounting billions in revenue and millions of jobs

Trump has instructed the interior department to review dozens of national monuments to see if they could be scrapped or resized to allow better access for oil and gas drilling. A moratorium on coal mining on federal land has been lifted while a bar on offshore drilling off the Atlantic coast is being reviewed. Trump’s budget also calls for drilling in the Arctic national refuge in Alaska, a plan that has dismayed environmentalists.

4803.jpg

The two bluffs known as the ‘Bears Ears’. The newly created Bears Ears National Monument and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, are under review by the Trump administration. Photograph: George Frey/Getty Images
5. Approve pipelines
In one of his first acts of presidential pen wielding, Trump called for the rapid approval of the controversial Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines. The two oil-carrying projects are now pushing ahead, with the Dakota Access pipeline already registering its first leaks before it is even fully operational.

2256.jpg


https://www.google.com.tw/amp/s/amp...trump-worst-things-climate-change-environment
 
"I don't like Donald Trump, but let me take every concievable opportunity to rush to his defense cuz conservative bro, I don't actually like him tho."
 
No, because your criticisms were triggered shit. Often mischaracterizations, hysteria, hyperbole and so on.

I never liked Obama but did the exact same thing when I saw friends make weird and/or retarded critiques of him. I was always of the mind that you didn't need to be hyperbolic, blow shit out of proportion or just make shit up about Donald Trump in order to criticise him. He is a human buffet of idiocy, right there to be pointed at.

And if I'm being honest, all our private conversations about logic, rationality, Christopher Hitchens etc always stood out in stark contrast to the way you acted outside of our private conversations. I never saw you apply any of that to your criticisms of Trump.