- Jun 2, 2005
- 2,865
- 2
- 38
Is this really a "not done" ?
I am ready to make a step up from the POD XT now.. the XT is very cool, but for me, it lacks something called air.. bit digital as well here and there.. fine for demo's though, but i think we all agree when i say that recording a real amp has the edge over a POD XT, right?
Well, i live in a crowded house here.. and there is no way i can crank up a mesa or peavey up till 6-7 on the master dial... that's why i have the XT in the first place.. however, is recording those amps an option at lower volumes? i have read and heard that it's not a good idea to record at lower volumes at all, but is it really that much of a difference then?
thanks!
I am ready to make a step up from the POD XT now.. the XT is very cool, but for me, it lacks something called air.. bit digital as well here and there.. fine for demo's though, but i think we all agree when i say that recording a real amp has the edge over a POD XT, right?
Well, i live in a crowded house here.. and there is no way i can crank up a mesa or peavey up till 6-7 on the master dial... that's why i have the XT in the first place.. however, is recording those amps an option at lower volumes? i have read and heard that it's not a good idea to record at lower volumes at all, but is it really that much of a difference then?
thanks!