Seizing The Corporate Media - The Immediast Movement

ClearLight

Member
Nov 29, 2001
34
1
8
Visit site
-Seizing the Media-

Asian philosophy instructs enlightenment. But given our daily exposure to a barrage of persuasive messages, monologues, sales pitches, come-ons, and uninformative hyper-sensational news, common sense and intimacy are tough enough a struggle to maintain.
We can each see how extended exposure to television and mass media dulls people with a sense of numbness and nausea. From every public space a monologue of coercion penetrates our senses and rapes our attention. Wherever we look, wherever we listen, wherever we go: the pornography of billboards, bus side placards, subway cards, glaring storefront signs and displays, the glut of junk mail, stupid fly-by beach planes and blimps, coupons, obnoxious bumper stickers and breast pins, embarrassing service forms, plastic banners and ribbons, absurd parades, street-corner handouts, windsheild wiper flyers, matchbook ads, business cards, screaming radios, the daily papers, every nanosecond of television, the package wrapped around everything we buy - from the label in our underwear to the robot computer that calls us in our homes - only the upper atmosphere and the ocean floor offer any sanctuary from America's ecology of coercion. At every turn the monologues drone on, imbedding the psychological mutagens that coax us to become pathetic customers and unquestioning flag wavers. At every turn we are under subtle attack.

The media serve the interests of the State and other corporations, but never the interests of the public. The media's screen of agression and seduction is designed to mesmerize and captivate the largest possible sector of population whose attention is then sold like scrap metal to advertisers and gang raped by their slogans, jingles, and manic images. Protected by an uncrossable media moat, agents of the State profit from war and relax behind a web of information laws, censorship powers, and vapid explanations that swat the public of detailed intelligence and mass resistance.

So long as we do not control our own government, our own state, and our own broadcast media - the mirror with which we reflect on the reality of lives - we will continue to be forced to see fun-house mirror distortions of ourselves projected onto a dumpster of products that promise to make us each desirable, sophisticated, and correct. At every turn we are under attack.

Incest Of Corporations And The State
The State controls information, debt, and violence and targets collective identity. Corporations control commodification, work, and media and target individual identity. Both deploy the same psychological strategies for imbedding the public with their messages and directives. Never were their common strategies more transparent than when US disinformation and propaganga service, the infamous USIA, decided to step-up its psy-warfare campaign against the people of Cuba in the Spring of 1989. Until then, attempts to psychologically destabalize the Cuban people were comcentrated in the broadcasts of Radio Marti, the Florida based, Government owned pirate radio station that to this day illegally transmits propaganda and disinformation into domestic Cuban radios. In the Spring of 1989, the USIA added images to their psy-war arsenal and began transmitting tele-broadcasts from a hot air balloon controlled from the Key West signals station. Sibling of Radio Marti, the project was dubbed TV Marti.
A few things are to be held in mind here. First, after the Creel Commission saturated Americans with pro-war propaganda during WWI, the level of public disgust was so intense that laws were enacted forbidding the State from ever subjecting the public to its propaganda again. Thus, the USIA's Voice of America propaganda broadcasts that we can hear today in Amsterdam, Berlin, and Prague, we are protected against hearing here on our own turf. Propaganda is so disorienting and confusing that Americans have actually passed laws forbidding it here in its crude verifiable forms.

The fact that we must now face and destroy is that advertising, entertainment, and news have become the government's Trojan Horse into the psyche of the public. What was TV Marti's first propaganda broadcast aimed at the minds of the Cuban people? MTV. Think about it: The USIA's first broadcast of tele-propaganda delivered MTV's corporate rock videos! At every turn we are under attack.

State Private Media
--------------------------------- -----------------------------
1. Representation is reality. 1. Representation is reality.
2. Secrecy is security. 2. Ownership is identity.
3. Violence empowers the violent. 3. To consume is to connect.

The Assault Of Spectacle Media is twofold: while immersing the public in a barrage of coercive messages, commercial media serves as an accomplice to political felony, murder, and treason by censoring the details and dimensions of State activity from democratic processes and public intelligence. Culture, awareness, and democratic power are what we surrender for an internal economy that is dependent on the relentless preparation and sale of public attention for penetration by corporate and State advertising. The Immediasts stand in solidarity with all groups and individuals who act in opposition to this situation and whose work assists omnicultural vocality, public production libraries, public media and an open state.
Methods of Mind Control
Immediast research has turned up two invaluable sources revealing State tactics of behavior modification, subliminal manipulation, and mind control. The first is the Psychological Warfare Manual authored and distributed by the CIA to the Nicaraugan terrorists, the Contras. The instruction manual directives state:
In effect, the human being should be considered the priority objective in a political war. And conceived as the military target of guerrilla war, the human being has its most critical point in his mind. Once his mind has been reached, the "political animal" has been defeated, without necessarily receiving bullets...
This conception of guerrilla warfare as political war turns Psychological Operations into the decisive factor of the results. The target, then, is the minds of the population, all the population: our troops, the enemy troops and the civilian population...

Communication is a way to ask and give the answer to the same question.

The manual goes on to instruct its readers how to effectively deceive, blackmail, and assasinate individuals antagonistic to the imperatives of the State.

Our second source of documentation exposing State led programs of media subversion is found in the video documentaries and published articles of Fred Landis. Landis first discovered the presence of mind control tactics in commercial broadcast media by monitoring daily newspapers produced by the CIA in Chile in 1973. His resulting Ph.D dissertation outlined CIA tactics of subliminal manipulation and mind control and was used against the CIA in Volume 7 of the 1975 Hearings of the Senate Church Committee; "The CIA and the Media," and in the 1977-1978 Hearings of the House Intelligence Committee. Landis' observations and research exposed a now easily identifiable method deployed by the State to psychologically destabilize and subliminally coerce a given population. Based on the cross- cultural linguistic theory and research generated by Charles Osgood (funded by the CIA), the government deploys the following method, called Semantic Differential:

* First, media agents identify cultural symbols which have deep emotional associations within a target population's everyday domestic, cultural, and spiritual lives. Agents then use these symbols as in-roads to the people's unconscious and manipulate these symbols as subliminal imbeds which can be antagonized or resonated in accordance with situations being manufactured by the CIA. "Indirect attacks on government ministers employ the juxtaposition of photos of the targeted official with unrelated headlines, subliminal propaganda, and pre-selected word associations. By simply placing the key word near a photo of government leaders, a crude behaviorist attempt is made to condition new associations and new values to familiar personalities."
* "The combined effect of word associations (derived from the semantic differential) with subliminal imbeds is so strong that it displaces any other message" - even ones which disprove the connotations and meaning of the effect.

State tactics of media control deliver subliminal and disinforming directives in the guise of news. Targeting deep psychological imbeds present in every culture, the State instills shock, terror, confusion, sexual arousal, awe or uncertainty by antagonizing or coupling these imbeds with sensational headlines associating such things as Satanism with enemies, and religious miracles and good luck with leaders implanted or puppetted by the State. The symbols change from culture to culture. During the US Supreme Court Nomination Hearings of Clarence Thomas, the New York Times ran a cover photo (Sunday 13 October 1991) of Senator Hatch holding up a copy of The Exorcist and associating it with Anita Hill! This was not an accusation, it was a psychological tactic. According to the semantic differential, the deep and negative feelings experienced in people by such associations outlast evidence which demonstrates their falsehood and perversion.
Immediast Tactics
Asian philosophy instructs self-realization and awakening, but when under attack, Asian philosophy also instructs methods for overpowering an assailant with the force of his own assault. We herald this approach. Immediast tactics aim to neutralize the key images and text being imbedded into the public by the media and the State. Our work is the liberation of public space from the broadcasts of corporations, businesses, and departments of the State; and the abolition of public captivity as spectators to the ceaseless barrage of billboards, manipulative images, State constructed news and propaganda. The question is, how we can lockjaw the spectacle with its own force?
Returning all airborne commercial broadcast media to public direction, access, and control will naturally release cultural forces difficult at present to imagine - the mind turned inside out won't be a viral imageslogan on a Gannet billboard, it will be living people on the airwaves and in the streets.

Of course we anticipate struggle on the part of the State and corporations. Let them struggle, doing so opens up new fissures and points of access. In the meantime, we call on you to engage in your own actions. We call on artists, writers, posterists, activists, and networkers from all countries to assist with our project. Vocalize your disgust. Speak up. Fight back. Liberate the public spaces in the zones that most need it - the ones in your everyday life. Organize Networker Congresses. Strike. Send to our journal, Noospapers, your statements, manifestoes, critiques, tracts, tactics, poetry, posters, collages, documentation, graphics and art. Together we can begin the liberation of public spaces and end our forced captivity in a spectator democracy.

Revolution And Insurgence
Revolution is the overthrow of government; our aim is to overthrow the media. Armed insurrection is unnecessary in so far as it is words and images which are shot at us, not bullets. But the words and images which keep us in bondage, which inundate us with the political muzak of disinformation, halk baked scandals, shock, empty desires, and subliminal imbeds are what enable State and corporate men to shoot bullets at people outside our borders, slaughtering people like you and me by the thousands in Iraq, in Panama, in Grenada, in El Salvador, in Libya, in Nicaragua, in Africa. With the media in the hands of the public, State agents who order secret wars, election riggings, destabilization programs and other covert actions will be forced into open view and the democratic control of the public.
The New Servant Class
Establishing democratic legitimacy in America begins not with overthrowing our governments, but with diminishing them to the role of public servants. After all, in America, State agents are still employees of the public. The Immediast goal is to make government officials the only servants in our society, the audience of public expressions, the assistants of public cultures, economy, and the archivists of public histories. The legitimization of democratic government will come from multicultural public movements, not State initiatives. The airwaves are public domain to be used by and for the public - and public movements will converge through the establishment of national public media - liberation of the airwaves. This is our work for the 90s.
The Case Of USA vs. John Poindexter
The outcome of the federal court case USA vs. John Poindexter has pushed us from long standing civilian silence to insurgent Immediast action. Look carefully: North and Poindexter reversed their felonies by proving that extended media exposure destroyed case witnesses' ability to think independently of the words and images the media had saturated them with. This is now American history, a legal precedent. Admitting the mind-control action of mass media protected State felons from public law. The precedent of USA vs. John Poindexter thus establishes that:
Spectacle representations derived from actual public events manipulate perception and control the natural outcome of our events.
Spectacle media disables the public to think and perceive freely of the biases imbedded by exposure to mass media noise and images.
Spectacle media serves as a moat protecting the National Security State from public participation and democratic scrutiny. Meanwhile, North and Poindexter, both felons, are back on the streets again.
These crimes and their accomplices in the White House, CIA, NSA, CNN, DOD, ABC, USIA, MTV, CBS etc are too much to tolerate given the increasing violence, debt, recession, and systemic deception forced upon us every day by the government and consumer media.

Our drive to connect, to create, to love and make love, to play, to communicate, to share, to live freely, to participate or be left in peace, to represent our own desires and author our own cultures and live with meaning that we together create are under relentless invasion and constant assault. The time to change has come.

We no longer tolerate being besieged with manipulative messages that we don't want to hear and cannot respond to. We no longer tolerate an inaccessible State that censors, blocks, denies information to the public. We no longer tolerate the spectacle that ultimately serves to absolve criminals like Poindexter, Bush, North and their lickspittles from crimes of international violence and domestic debt. The time has come to turn the ecology of coercion on itself. The time has come to veto, overwhelm, and subvert the messages of all airborne commercial broadcast media until they are returned to complete public direction, access, and control. How long should we wait to liberate public spaces from the blister of billboards and advertisements? The air is public domain, and the airwaves are ours to hear our own voices, see our own colors, enjoy our own conversations, and celebrate in the vast community of cultures. Remember: dialogue offsets the hegemony, and intimacy empowers.

The time has come to restore the democratic power and public space that have been coopted and colonized by commercial media.

Celebrate public culture. Reconnect. Seize the media. The air is yours.

In 1992 we begin the work that needs to be done. Asian philosophy instructs enlightenment.

Towards An Ecology Of Information - The Immediast Approach
0. Participating in the proliferation, crosspollination, and consolidation of counter-commercial print, audio, visual, modem, activist, and correspondence media.

1. Documenting the basic sources, dynamics, and effects of corporate and State media control. Exposing methods of mind control, behavior modification, and image imbedding.

2. Openly discussing tools and methods that strengthen immunization and freedom from deceptive, disinforming, and subliminal media exposures. Upgrading public media literacy to decode, produce, and broadcast in all communications media.

3. Open cultural expressions, education, networking and resistance.

4. Reclaiming public sovereignty of the airwaves.

5. The liberation of all public space from government, corporate, and business messages.

6. Public takeover of all airborne commercial broadcast media and the creation of public production libraries.

7. Liberation as glasnost: the emergence of democratic public communications and media networks.

The Immediast Approach
The Immediasts invision liberation changes in public access and cultural freedom. We draw from the powers of public domain and personal freedom to counter the systemic penetrations of commercial media into individual privacy through public space.
Our actions are exerted through immediate and unpredictable means. We believe that the institutional restraints imposed on social change drain cultural growth and momentum rather than nurture their innovations and initiatives. We recognize insurgence as a legitimate response to sustained violation. We experience decommodification of consciousness and liberation of public space as simultaneous projects, that occur together, side by side, and at the same time. Immediast activity releases public insurgence mounting to these ends, and works not only to reclaim the inviolability of public attention and intelligence, but to equip and serve them with the technology for cultural freedom and democratic power. This is not a theoretical exercise aimed at intellectuals and folk on the left, this is about equiping all sectors of the public to engage in the development of a public media and an open State.

1.Civilization has known no golden age. When people organize to create powers greater than any one person's ability to manage or maintain, power is used to advantage the few and control the many. Remember that human slavery was a brisk business in the United States until little more than 100 years ago. Saudi Arabia practiced slavery until the 1960s.
2. In industrial societies where people are organized into physical production, physical forces are used to control the public and, in turn, used by the public to vanquish over-concentrations of resources and power.

In Information societies where populations are subject to abstract economies and manipulated by a landscape of images, infotainment, and advertising people can seize democratic management of their political, cultural, and educational lives by gaining control of media. Such is the heart of Immediast theory, art, and action.

3. Revolution is the overthrow of government by its forced subjects; Immediaism is the seizure of media by its captive audience. The Immediast presence will amplify until all airborne corporate and commercial broadcast media are under complete public direction, access, and control.

Towards And Immediast International
I. Immediast actions, art, and insurgent networking reach their first sphere of realization in the development of public production libraries and the complete public seizure of all airborne commercial broadcast media. We believe that consummate upgrades in the structure of social, cultural and political life can only occur by public action outside the channels of delay and diffusion operative in State institutions. Remember USA vs. Poindexter. Remeber Dept. of Defense vs. The Nation, Village Voice, Mother Jones, The Progressive, and Pacifica Radio et all. Remember.
We have zero interest in passively watching the collapse of America's two-wing business party that markets Leaders as a set of images and vapid patriotic sentiments that can be grasped by a first grader through three word bumper stickers and 20 second prime time TV commercials. Our goal is to liberate public intelligence from such inane violations of space, time and attention. Our efforts rest when Leaders, business party or otherwise, are public servants whose every plan, project, and viewpoint is under relentless accountability and scrutiny to an uninhibited public press. Subscription government, public media, and an open state are what we're after.

By abolishing commercial imperatives, press pooling, and censorship, media accessed and directed by the public paralyzes State ability to conceal covert actions like Iran/Contra or the actions leading up to the invasion of Panama and the abduction of that country's figurehead. Domestically, we aim to collapse the ecology of coercion that depends on buying and selling public attention through advertising - and the stupor, numbness, bigotry, and general ignorance it promotes. When our work is done, advertising and billboards will fly beside the Soviet flag in the museum of dead totalitarian experiments.

II. Immediast projects advance cultural ecologies that facilitate public education, access and creativity. We support efforts to expand, defend, and upgrade public space as free space.

The real oppressiveness we experience is an oppression against our cultures, awareness, and democratic power.

Our revulsion with the violence of the State and coercion of the media restrains our impulse to employ like meaures against the people whose work it is to perpetuate the present system. It is our greater drive for liberation from these conditions and life in fuller freedom tht directs our actions towards systemic change rather than impeachment, incarceration, or execution of individuals, though these may inevitably occur by non-immediasts.

From the vantage point of public media we can strip State agents of all power beyond accountable public service, insuring that oppression has no voice and coercion no media. Public media can gently remove the trump card of "National Security" from the hands of the NSA, DOD, CIA, FBI, DOE, etc, and begin organizing a democracy while dismantling the warheads of America's covert State. As the people of the Russian commonwealth have vanquished the central monologue controlling their lives and culture, so too will we squelch the studios of coercion that prevent our democracy, violate our intelligence, disrupt our space, and sell our attention. This we will do by reclaiming the public airwaves.

Creating Public Production Libraries - An Immediast Project
If literacy measures people's ability to read and write, people living in information societies are media illiterate - unequiped to decode the effects of media on intelligence and intimacy and unable to write in the language of broadcasting. While the media's ecology of coercion assuages public desire to participate in the media by emphasizing the bottom-line significance of public polls, Gallop & its pathetic epigones merely totalize a few public neurons into the status of a collective brain. How many of your comrades and kin have ever participated is a Gallup poll, anyway?
Public seizure of all commercial broadcast media establishes what public production libraries nurture: liberation from advertising, the decommodification of public attention, the upgrade of public intelligence, the development of media literacy, the documentation of public productions, facilitated cultural expression, the termination of covert State action, violence, propaganda, and media control, and the inviolable ground for a public media and open state. Such are the aims of all Immediast plans and projects.

Public production libraries will be built in sisterhood with the public libraries that now exist. Within each production library will be the facilities to produce print, audi, visual, and database material. "Librarians" will serve as technicians, maintainance, and repair people. Production libraries will give people a larynx through which to speak. The media seized, corporations silenced, and the State under relentless scrutiny, we will reconect and celebrate who we are.

III. Regardless of their ostensibly radical message, alternative media have generally reproduced the dominant spectacle-spectator relation. The point is to undermine it - to challenge the conditioning that makes people susceptible to media manipulation in the first place. Which ultimately means challenging the social organization that produces that conditioning, that turns people into spectators of prefabricated adventures because they are prevented from creating their own. - Ken Knabbs, "The War and the Spectacle", Retrofuturism 15.

During recent years, artists and intellectuals have stopped talking about Orwell and have begun talking back to the real media. Collectives have formed and ink has flowed. With few exceptions, the main gripe articulated has been against media misrepresentation and censorship. Thinkers like Chomsky and Parenti have gone so far as to discuss the underlying mechanisms used by the media to control perception, "manufacture consent", and modify public behavior. Who, however, has presented any clear plans or proposals for overcoming the hegemony of US State and corporate broadcasting? The Immediasts are only the beginning.

Recent activist initiatives have begun targeting the public vulnerability to news, images, infotainment, and the pus of coercive images that we all wallow in daily. All such critiques seem to presume that a sudden outburst of free thinking and artistic disruption will somehow wheedle, cajole, or enlighten the snakes coming out of the media Medusa. With even less telos are those who devote their academic scrutiny to media watch-dog activity, vulturing over the lies and propaganda as our history is diswritten. Significant as their efforts, newsletters and intent are, media reform in response to public pressure will never and can never reorient the media's fundamental activity of preparing and commodifying public attention for penetration by corporate advertisers. Alternative viewpoints find airtime only if the corporate hegemons are convinced that they can captivate an untapped public sector. Its always about markets, never about movements.

While diligent media activism can and eventually will alter media representations of misgyny, racism, homophobia, and displays of violence, sisyphean is the hope that anything short of public insurgence can restructure the ecology of coercion systemic to our spectacle culture and Security State. Because advertising is persuasion and propaganda is news, "challenging the conditioning that makes people susceptible to media manipulation" - to quote Ken Knabb's tract in the recent issue of Retrofuturism Magazine - is like challenging the air to reject pollutants. People perceive that McDonalds and Burger King, republicans and democrats, coke and pepsi, are actually alternatives to one another because the imperatives of commercial media are to commodify choice, operate through immersion, and totalize public perception. There is no escape, no sanctuary, no retreat. Only deluge and bombardment, and the desire and addiction that come with imbeds left by long term over-exposure.

-In the 20th century, he who controls the screen controls consciousness, information and thought. The screen is a mirror of your mind. If you're passively watching screens, you're being programmed. If you're editing you're own screen, you're in control of your mind.
Americans voluntarily stick their amoeboid faces toward the screen seven hours a day and suck up information that Big Brother is putting there. Americans spend more time looking at monitors than they do gazing into the eyes of family and friends. - Timothy Leary

IV. The Immediast counter-offensive studies and exerts tactics that direct the spectacle against itself. Our rage and disgust are rooted in our bondage as captive audience and forced spectators. Every billboard is a repulsion to encounter. Every commercial that rapes our attention is no less defiling an experience than the tourniquet of yellow ribbons that strangled out American information and scrutiny during the 42 days the US slaughtered Iraqis.

Immediast tactics play on the immediacy of information systems and experiment with ways to direct them against themselves. STaggering as our situation has become, it is still only people and machines that maintain it; the first we will overcome, the second we will seize.

The insurgent tactics of ACT UP, Earth First!, Art Fux, the Sits, the Gorilla Girls, and the Weathermen are rich with lessons. We see now that in a spectacle society, paradigmatic cultural, economic, and social upgrades need not be spearheaded by revolution and violence. What we do need to do is orient our connections, critiques, cultural production, and collective action toward a state of democratic critical mass.

Insightful, artistic or illuminating as our discourse may otherwise be, without advancing the awareness and insurgence to take-over the media, our discourse will continue to be pre-empted.

Synesthesia mixes the senses.

The Networker, A New Perception
In societies where information and media are as inaccessible and undemocratic as the governments that run them, uninhibited public communication, expression, and cultural production are acts of freedom and defiance. "Despite bountiful resouces, corporate profits and state security continued to prevail over public needs until..."

Immediast Underground.
 
Straight Talk on Harry Potter

STRAIGHT TALK # 22 ON HARRY POTTER

By William J. Schnoebelen

No book in recent years has attracted the success of the celebrated "Harry Potter" series. Supposedly these children’s novels, written by a woman in Britain named J. K. Rowling, have made her one of the wealthiest women in the world. She has written four books, the latest being HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE, which weighs in heavier than some laptop computers. In total, her books have sold more than 30 million copies.

Her appealing hero is Harry Potter, a nerdy orphan boy whose parents were killed when he was very young by an evil wizard named Voldemort. From this encounter, he has a lightning bolt-shared scar on his forehead is raised by dull, cruel relatives (an aunt and uncle) who are "Muggles," the Harry Potter term for non-wizards who don’t like or believe in magic and who tend to persecute those who do.

Harry’s saga starts when he is 10 old in THE SORCERER’S STONE and he ages a bit in each book. He is 14 in the latest book. Without going into all the plot details (which may be better known than the Bible), Harry is rescued from his bleak, Muggle-ridden existence by an invitation to come and attend "Hogwart’s School of Witchcraft and Wizardry." From there, he gets into all sorts of adventures, gradually building to a confrontation with the evil wizard who killed his parents.

These are marketed as children’s books (the first is suggested for ages 8-13 and the last book ages 10 to adult) although they are well written and are being enjoyed by adults as well. The problem is in the spiritual nature of the books. Not many books for children come to mind where the main hero is a wizard (or wizard in training).

To be sure, magic is a common feature in fairy tales and fantasy. But whether you are talking about Grimm’s Fairy Tales (some of which WERE awfully grim), the WIZARD OF OZ, or other common stories, there is a difference. Usually the magicians and wizards were secondary characters or even villains and the main ones (Dorothy, Snow White, etc.) were ordinary mortals who were either being victimized or helped by witches. But Harry is the hero, and readers are being asked to identify with him. This is of critical importance, as we shall see later. Magic is serious business, as anyone will tell you who has practiced it. I was heavily involved in magic and sorcery for at least ten years and I believe I am qualified to speak about the subject with some authority and experience.

A rather surprising controversy has arisen within the Body of Christ over the issue of Harry Potter books. These books ARE about magic and sorcery. Of this there can be no doubt. The controversy in the church revolves around whether or not such books should be in the hands of Christian children. Chuck Colson, who is a highly respected Evangelical author and speaker, astonished many when he weighed in on the side of Harry. He claimed the books were not dangerous for children because they were not about magic in the occult sense. Rather, he said, they concern "mechanical magic" which is a literary device. He states that the magic in the Potter books is:

"…purely mechanical, as opposed to occultic. That is, Harry and his friends cast spells, read crystal balls, and turn themselves into animals–but they don’t make contact with a supernatural world…. [It’s not] the kind of real-life witchcraft the Bible condemns." [1]

While Colson does not exactly define his term, mechanical magic, he implies it is something on the order of ray guns or time travel in the science fiction genre — a fictitious construct designed to entice the reader and move the plot along — part of an entirely fictitious universe. I do not find this persuasive.

First of all, part of the problem is that witches and magicians do exist. They DO cast spells and read crystal balls. A few even work on the discipline of lycanthropy[2] — shape-shifting into animals. Thus, there is nothing fictitious about any of this, except in the minds of head-in-the-sand Christians.

Secondly, part of the problem is defining what magic is. It is a term that has acquired all sorts of connotations in the public mindset. A newborn baby can be "magical." Although it may be poetic to say that your new girl friend’s smile is magic, what has happened is that "magic" has come to mean anything that induces a sense of awe or wonder. This is not precise.



Magic and Magick



Then there is the confusion between stage magic (illusion) such as practiced by folks like Houdini or David Copperfield and "real" magic. For this reason, most serious practitioners of the art of sorcery prefer to spell it the old English way, as "magick," precisely to distinguish it from pulling a rabbit out of a hat.

The famed sorcerer Aleister Crowley defined magick as "the science of causing change to occur in conformity with will." That is very broad. Obviously, if I turn on a light switch in my home, I have caused change to occur in conformity with my will. The way most students of the subject exegete Crowley’s remark is to say that it refers to causing "change" without using the usual mundane methods of causality available to all people.

A dictionary definition is "the supposed art of influencing the course of events by the occult control of nature or of the spirits." [3] This definition is key to understanding the problem with Harry Potter and with Colson’s definition. Most all definitions of magic include the idea of occultism and/or trafficking in spirits. Most often, the spirits are evil.

Harry is a child who is a wizard in training. What is a wizard? Again, the dictionary tells us that a wizard is "a sorcerer, a magician."[4] ANY of the textbooks of magick, called grimoires,[5] make it very clear that the source of true magical power is making pacts with and controlling spirits - evil spirits.

Another bit of confusion that must be cleared up is the difference between magick and witchcraft. The Potter books tend to blur them together, reflecting a common misperception. They are not the same, as any Wiccan (white Witch) will tell you. Some witches practice magick (we did) but some do not. Witchcraft as it is popularly understood these days is a religion, a pagan religion involving the worship of nature deities. Most often these are seen as a goddess and a god. The main point of Wicca for most serious witches is devotion to the gods or goddesses of their religion.

If witches do magick, it is usually of a simple variety, cord spells, candle spells or healings, etc. This is often what is called "folk magic" and is very different from ceremonial magick, the kind usually associated with wizards and magicians. Folk magic is usually done on a "limited budget" and is pretty simple. It often involves things drawn from nature. Nowadays, anthropologists call it "cultural spiritism."

Magicians, in contrast to Wiccans, often worship nothing. A Wiccan practitioner of magick might have faith in the gods of Wicca, but most magicians we have dealt with over the years are either agnostic or atheistic.

Usually, when one thinks of magick or sorcery, we are talking about "high magick" or "ceremonial magick." Ceremonial or high magick, as the name implies, usually involves quite complex rituals and a lot of time, study and preparation. For example, some of the rituals we did as witches who happened to be ceremonial magicians took more than six months to prepare.

Witches PRAY to their deities. A magician will seldom pray to anyone. He or she will command! The magician believes in the efficacy of her ritual work. She would not pray to get a result anymore than I would pray before turning on the light in hope that I would get electricity. It is not a matter of faith, it is a matter of "scientific technology". However, the technology behind magick is all mental, emotional and demonic in nature.



Conjuring



Colson and others make the mistake of assuming that there really is no such thing as the kind of magic described in the Potter books. This is not entirely true. While some of the activities in the Potter books, (playing Quidditch [6] for example) are obviously fantasy, many of them are not. Many Christians do not even realize that there are people out there who are serious sorcerers. Since they assume that all this is fictitious, what can be the harm in reading about it?

As a former magician myself, let me explain what charming little Harry Potter would have to do to arrive at the place he is at in these books. Let me walk you through an actual magical rite in brief. To achieve the power to fly, for example, the wizard might employ any number of rituals. He would have to determine what kind of elemental force is involved.

Flight or levitation would be of the AIR element.[7] This would determine the kind of robes, incense, candles, evocations, talismans or amulets and ritual tools used. Simply put, the wizard must use all the right tools and then cast a magick circle [8] and a triangle of manifestation. These are usually painted on the floor, or laid down in some sort of incense, sulfur or chalk. The wizard stays in the circle. There are certain prescribed numbers of candles or flaming pots that might be used, depending on the magical workbook and system used. The wizard would need to wear a certain colored robe — usually blue or orange for air. He would be armed with a magic wand (not a stick with a sparkly star on the end) because wands are usually attributed to the air element. He might also have sword, because it is often felt that to be prudent you should have a sword when doing evocations. With the wand or the sword it is believed that you can order spirits to obey you.

An evocation is the calling up of a demon or djinn (the Arabic form of our word, "genie."). The term evocation is used to distinguish it from the other common ceremonial magic practice called invocation. In magic, invocation is calling upon a higher being than yourself, such as an angel or god. Believe it or not, there are magical workbooks that involve calling upon archangels and angels and forcing them to obey you. Of course, a good angel could not be commanded by sorcery.[9] It therefore stands to reason that such angels would be fallen and evil. Evocation is used to call on lower-than-human beings such as demons or elementals.[10]

The actual ceremony (aside from preparation) can take a long time. The wizard summons the spirit into this "triangle of manifestation." This is a triangle painted or inscribed on the floor about a meter on each side. This is the evocation. There will be lots of incense burnt, partially because this is believed to give the spirit some sort of material basis with which to materialize. The goal is to actually get the demon to appear visibly in the triangle, but in a form that is not too disturbing to the wizard’s sensibilities.



Bargains with the Demon?



Once the demon has manifested, the wizard will have some sort of talisman (which could be a medallion or a piece of parchment with writing on it) with which to bind the demon to their will. The demon will not want to obey, so there is usually a long period of threatening the demon, brandishing the sword at it and uttering horrid maledictions if it will not obey. The demon will also try to escape or trick the wizard into leaving the circle. If the wizard should step out of the circle during this time, the demon would have the right to crush him to a pulp and carry him off to hell (or somewhere like the abyss [11]). Another thing that could occur is that if the wizard accidentally does something to disturb the integrity of the circle (scuffing off some of the chalk or sulfur, etc.) then the demon could do whatever it wanted to him.

It may take several hours, but finally the demon will grant the wizard’s demands.[12] This may involve simply bestowing the power of flight on the wizard, or charging him a talisman with powers of flight so that as long as he wears it, he can fly. Then the demon is released to return to its place with the final adjuration that it promises to do nothing to ever harm the wizard once he banishes the circle. Demons are supposed to keep their word (??).

This is all based on an elaborate set of rubrics that, in my experience, the demon or spirit frequently will just ignore and rip the wizard to shreds. Most wizards really believe that these rules (such as the circle) will keep the demon at bay. Sometimes the demons will allow the wizard to luxuriate in this delusion for some time before finally lowering the boom. This is why most REAL wizards I have known have come upon bad ends. VERY bad ends.



Step into the Abyss



What follows is an actual account of a ceremonial magic rite that went very wrong. The magician had set up his circle in the garage after painting all the windows over with black paint. He done all of the ceremonies described earlier and had called up a demon into the triangle. The garage was filled with the smell of incense and the howling of the demon. It was not happy at being confined to the triangle.

After almost four hours of cursing and adjurations back and forth between the wizard and the demon, the room had grown very dark. There was no light left but the candles and the lurid coals of incense. The very chalk lines on the floor marking the circle and triangle seemed to shimmer in the gloom. The demon seemed just about to buckle to the will of the magician. Then, all of a sudden, the telephone rang!

Without thinking, the magician reached out of the circle to answer it. With a horrid scream, his entire body disappeared in a belch of flame, along with the demon. In a second, the garage was empty of all but the faithful, terrified scribe sitting in the corner and the smell of roasting human flesh. The magician was never heard from again, and left behind a wife and child. The ultimate irony of that tragedy is that there was no phone in the garage!



A Deadly Game



This illustrates how demons will NOT play by the rules, and how deadly magic can actually be. A magician would say that this unfortunate fellow had been sucked into the abyss forever. A more Biblical suggestion would be that he was sent to hell for his blasphemy. Most magicians ultimately think that they can become God. At the very least, they believe they can acquire god-like powers.

This horror is the "back story" behind cute little Harry. True wizardry or sorcery would not really allow him to have much fun at all without going through the above rituals. This is what Harry would have to learn at his wizard’s academy, Hogwart’s. Here is where the "mechanical magic" concept comes in. People like Mr. Colson want to tell us that none of this applies because Harry was BORN a wizard. His parents were magicians. Therefore, he comes by his talents naturally. He is a natural born wizard.

There is a bit of truth in this. In real life, if Harry’s parents were really magicians or wizards, they would be demonized to their eyeballs. They would have more demons than a cheap hotel has roaches. Because of Exodus 20:5-6[13], those demons would pass into baby Harry at birth. He would indeed grow up with a (super)natural propensity for sorcery. However, instead of having to conjure up all these different demons with their different powers, he would have them right within him from birth. It is "convenient," but it is not something I would want MY child to desire.

In fact, we have ministered to several people who were born into just such a background and who were horribly tormented by demons simply because they didn’t particularly WANT to get involved in sorcery and all the nasty things than can ultimately be expected in such pursuits. Only the power of Jesus could set such people free.

The fact of the matter is, there is no such thing as "mechanical magic" in the sense that I believe Mr. Colson is using the term. It cannot be just a plot device because magick, by definition involves a spiritual component. Unlike ray guns or time machines, magick brings with it a philosophical or even theological worldview. You could be a Christian, a Jew or a Buddhist and fly a rocket ship. The same could not be said of magick.



You are What You Eat!



To return to the point about the difference between magick and witchcraft, magick is essentially agnostic. The true goal of every wizard is to become his own god. There is no room in world-view of a sorcerer for a sovereign God. This magic world-view[14] sees the universe as a machine that dispenses favors to magicians in response to their performing the right ritual.

It is opposed to the Biblical world-view in which there is an all-powerful, sovereign God that we cannot manipulate with charms. This God is a Person, not a machine or an impersonal force. In the Biblical world-view, we pray to God and if He feels our request is in His will, then he grants it.

This is a major concern of mine in seeing these kids devouring Harry Potter books. Whether or not they grow up to be sorcerers, they are immersing themselves in the magic world-view that does not fit with the Bible. You cannot be your own god and also worship the one, true God. This is why these books are more dangerous than they appear. You are what you eat, intellectually and spiritually.

If you consume books like Harry Potter that promote a magical view of the universe, you will come to believe in those things - gradually. This change in beliefs will be very subtle. It will seep into your mind like smoke and before you know it, it will become a part of your mindset.

On top of that, many media report that children are not just reading the Potter books, they are re-reading over and over again! They do this because they are entertaining, but also because they find this world of sorcerers and magic beguiling and charming (both words rooted in magic) and because they IDENTIFY with the wizards. This is eerily like Christians who read and re-read the Bible, except of course they are digesting the very Words of God.

The Harry Potter books, in common with most horror and fantasy material, present a godless universe, one in which the most powerful wizard wins. They are books in which the hero is a wizard who shows no evidence of belief in God and does not use the power of prayer to combat evil. This is NOT the vision of the universe that a Christian parent should wish to instill in their child — nor is "white" magic an appropriate response to evil. John Andrew Murray, a Christian headmaster of a school in Raleigh, NC, has observed in USA TODAY that the Potter books contain no evidence of a "higher moral authority."[15] This creates a very morally confusing universe for young readers.

Some might object that the Hardy Boys, Superman or other juvenile heroes of old never prayed either. But the difference is that they did not use the devil’s tools (ceremonial magic, necromancy, etc.) to fight evil. Most of those heroes fought evil with physical might or intelligence (however, superhuman they might have been). Theirs was not primarily a spiritual battle. Harry’s battles are spiritual in nature, whether the author or the reader acknowledges it or not. In using sorcery, he is fighting fire by pouring gasoline on it!



Crucial Differences



Some people have said, "What is the difference between these books and the fantasy works of C.S. Lewis (the Narnia books) or J.R.R. Tolkien?" Well, three differences really. First of all, Lewis was a Christian, although he was not really the kind of Christian most evangelicals or fundamentalists would approve of. Tolkien was a devout Catholic. Whatever you might feel about Catholicism, both of these authors come from a strong Judeo-Christian background and there is a moral component in both their works, even though they are fantasy.[16] Fantasy, per se, is not bad. It is only bad if it promotes a godless or "might makes right" view of the world.

The second difference is that our culture and our world have changed enormously since the days of Tolkien and Lewis. Currently, our youth are awash in a culture that promotes evil, occultism, lust and power for its own sake. The magic world-view is all around them. It is promoted in Pokemon, in television, movies and music. More critical, it is often promoted in classrooms. Think about it, we now have several major TV shows where the heroes are witches. We even have one now called "Angel" (of all things) where the (anti) hero is a vampire!

Our young people swim in a miasma of spiritual filth that they cannot even perceive anymore. Often, God has been driven from their lives and been replaced with the ethos of power, violence and self-indulgence - in short, Satanism. In the 1950’s and 1960’s such ideas were rare enough that children could afford being exposed to fantasy stories which promoted magic. It was an uncommon thing. Today, they are already on toxic spiritual overload just from living in our society. It is a miracle if any young person can keep their faith. Those who do are to be enormously commended.



Spiritual Lust?



This is the difference. The morals presented in the Potter books are anti-God and anti-Christian. More importantly, the lifestyle of magick is presented as fun. Few kids would find magick so appealing if they knew they had to grapple with a hideous demon to acquire it; and even then have a good chance of being slaughtered before the end of the ritual.

Not only that, the books are definitely drawing kids towards witchcraft. "Who wouldn’t choose a wizard’s life?" asked TIME magazine.[17] Even authentic, real Wiccans are "charmed" by the Potter series, according to the Associated Press.[18] Anything that witches find good and charming certainly ought to be viewed with suspicion by serious Christians.

This brings us to the third difference. The HP books are filled with much more explicit, appalling evil. There is a huge difference between what went on in Lewis or Tolkien and what kids are reading about in Harry Potter.

Just as a small sample, imagine a ten-year-old reading about:

1) The animal sacrifice of a cat[19]

2) Non-magicians like you and I (Muggles) are portrayed as dull, boring, cruel or useless;[20]

3) Power is the ultimate moral choice, irrespective of good or evil;[21]

4) Blood sacrifices;[22]

5) Cutting off the hand of a living person for a ritual;[23]

6) Boiling a baby alive in a cauldron;[24]

7) Possible demon possession;[25]

8) Werewolves [26] & vampires [27]

9) Bringing a evil wizard back from the dead through the shedding of blood [28]

10) Astral project or travel [29]

11) Casting spells and levitation [30]

12) Being able to shape-shift into an animal [31]

13) Crystal gazing or divination [32]

14) A hero (Harry) who tells lies, [33] steals, [34] breaks the rules,[35] and cheats by copying another student’s homework,[36] (cheating is OK in wizard ethics[37]).

15) Approval of astrology[38]

16) Being taught that people can exist without their souls[39]

17) Communion with the dead, dead souls living within us[40]

18) Harry takes mood-altering drugs (which are REAL herbs that are used by witches and shamans)[41]

19) Use of the "Hand of Glory,"[42] a grisly occult artifact that is the severed hand of a hanged murderer. Its fingers are lit and burned as candles. The hand is placed in a house to make everyone in the house fall into a spell.

20) Use of magic charms[43]

21) Belief that death is just the "next great adventure"[44] (which might be true if you were a Christian, but no one in these books is a professing Christian.) For non-Christians like Harry, death is a one-way ticket to hell!

These are dangerous, false ideas, especially for a younger person. Little attempt is being made to keep these books from the hands of children even younger than ten!

Additionally, there is a strong anti-family strain in the Potter books. As was mentioned earlier, Harry’s biological parents were murdered. Other than them, the only biological family he has are horrible. Harry’s uncle, aunt and cousin, with whom he lives, are mean, selfish and unloving. They are "Muggles" (non-sorcerers) who make Harry’s life miserable for his beliefs and even make him sleep in a closet!

Harry’s witchy friends are made to appear very appealing next to these loutish family members, who could be seen as caricatures of "fundamentalist" Christians. The ordinary human adults of his family are seen as stupid and powerless, while the witches and warlocks are wise and powerful. What sort of message does this send to children about their relatives who might not live lives as fascinating as that portrayed in the books?

Some of the Christians who defend HP books claim that one could never learn enough to truly practice magick or sorcery by reading them. That sort of statement could only be made by someone who was comparatively ignorant of sorcery. As a former magician myself, I can say that an intelligent child could learn a great deal of authentic magical material.

More important than that - these books enflame what C. S. Lewis called a "spiritual lust" for occult knowledge and power. They tickle the desire to become "little gods" and fill the child’s head with violence, blood sacrifice and a world view which is decidedly anti-Christian. Is this desirable? Especially when the books are so well-written that the children are reading them over and over and virtually memorizing them?

A Harry Potter movie is coming out, and will probably be accompanied by all the usual Hollywood marketing (Harry Potter Happy Meals, etc.). There are already calendars, action figures, etc. If the books are any indication, this could be a cultural phenomenon that will make STAR WARS look insignificant by comparison! Parents need to be aware of how dangerous the materials in these books are, and stand their ground courageously for the love of their children!
 
...Exactly my point.

I didn't even bother to read EITHER posts...

Anything that big is OBVIOUSLY not -straight to the point-, alot of wasted room about nothing.

But now that i hear that they were about harry pothead, i simply don't care.

This is a NEVERMORE forum. not a children's book forum...

...I think??

:err:
 
gosh, I'm starting to say this a lot, but one does not need to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist to see that there is a basci truth to the first article above.

what are tv commercials if not corporate propaganda ?

with the very same aims too.

so regarding them as uninformative and "alot of wasted room about nothing" only because of their length is, honestly speaking, quite dumb.

are the works of arthur schopenhauer "alot of wasted room about nothing" too ?

so judging the lack of worth of a text on it's length is a sign of lacking patience, or limited thought.

apart from the fact that I do consider the points brought up in the first post worthy of a prolongued discussion, it is simply a fact that to differentiate between political and economical power, and power-holders is foolish ignorance of reality, and that the media is in essence a tool of control in the hands of people that I do not believe to be above anything.

the above post is a rather good example of propaganda all by itself by the way.

no offence meant, but I jsut had to voice my opinion.
 
I actually didn't read much of the first post. I was mostly referring to the Harry Potter teaching children to worship Satan post that I found very ludicrous. I shouldn't have been so harsh in my response, but I find that people who say things like "You're not on the same level" are extremely arrogant, narrow-minded bastards who don't really have a clue about anything. So I wrote a harsh response based on that generalization and I apologize. The media definitely is a sham and definitely wields too much power, but I don't really feel like reading a long essay about it because I'm lazy.
 
harry who ?

sorry, the moment I had read that name I myself quit reading on. personal matter of distaste.
you are right of course about the "same level" comment.
guess I just wanted to make a point, and I was half asleep.
 
You wouldn't even know what *HEAVY METAL* is about, would you.
You dickhead's didn't even read the fucking article to make an honest opionion

STATEMENTS LIKE: extremely arrogant, narrow-minded bastards who don't really have a clue about anything.
CLUE do you know who I am, have you any CLUE, no , don't, thats a standard response by a girl no less.

FORGET you are bumbasses..

I will remember this.
 
Originally posted by immunocytometry
I will remember this.

Is that supposed to be some sort of threat? How old are you, 12? Do you really believe that the intent of Harry Potter is to convince children to worship Satan? Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

And, I second Trapped's question: Tell me champ, what IS *HEAVY METAL* about?

If people want to make a point, they don't need to be so long-winded about it. I do have work I have to get back to.
 
Your best work is near knock off time, I am I correct.
If i need to tell you what heavy metal is then really you have not done your home work, and its not about worshipping BLACK SABBATH'S first lp...
Good night to you Sir.
 
Originally posted by immunocytometry
Your best work is near knock off time, I am I correct.
If i need to tell you what heavy metal is then really you have not done your home work, and its not about worshipping BLACK SABBATH'S first lp...
Good night to you Sir.

I know what heavy metal is, but you seem to think that I don't, so I was asking what your "enlightened" definition is. As for the "best work is near knock off time" statement, I'm not quite sure what you mean, but I am employed full-time as a professional programmer. I don't even like Black Sabbath, so I'm not quite sure what you are trying to imply by your supposition that they are by whom I define metal. Each time you post on here you make yourself look more arrogant and less intelligent. I seriously doubt you even have the intellectual capacity to properly appreciate metal, and I even more doubt that you have reached puberty yet.

And good night to you too.
 
...C'mon... Tell us, What IS *HEAVY METAL* about??

...Because i certainly don't see a common thread between ANY of the heavy-metal bands that i listen to.

Martyr is *About* something different to what *Death* is about... Same with Nevermore, Opeth... etc.




I think you're stuck back in your childhood, when BLACK SABBATH was FUCKING DEATH-METAL!!!!!!! :lol:


Personally, i don't care for any of these bands that you say created 'Heavy metal'.

So tell me... what IS *HEAVY METAL*??