EMG owns them easily. Search for Marcus' clips of each.
Joe
Also if you´d compare passive EMG´s with passive Seymour & Duncan? Is EMG always the better choice for crushing guitar sounds? Or is it just a matter of taste under the line?
General consensus is (for what it's worth) that Duncans offer better pups for going passive (and a faaaaaar wider range) while EMGs are better actives (especially the 81 because it keeps the low end so tight).
And as far as my personal preferences go: I think the EMG HZ-4 is ok for a passive pickup, but it wouldn't be my first choice. I'd definitely prefer Duncans for passives. And it seems like I'm one of the very few who actually prefers the Blackouts (you gotta note that there are two different versions), because they sound less harsh, more organic to me and I like the "bigger" bass response of them.
This is weird for me. On all other forums I frequent, blackouts are preferred by almost everyone.
This is weird for me. On all other forums I frequent, blackouts are preferred by almost everyone.
I find the tone flattens out on EMG's a lot under really hard picking, and it just doesn't sound as defined.
I have one guitar with EMG's and another guitar with blackouts (both 7s but made out of different woods) and my blackouts OWN my EMG's. They just sound more clear and give more attack, but also hold definition a lot better.
Does anyone on these other forums actually record anything, or are their observations just from chugging along in the room?Not saying Blackouts can't work for recording, but as a rule I never trust a guitarist's opinion about tone!
Yeah, but my tastes in tones in the room have been shaped by my knowledge of recording and what sounds good in that medium; a guitarist who just farts around in practice/on stage all the time has no reason for his tastes the evolve because those are much more forgiving environments than a recording (or if no one can hear him live, he can blame the sound guy) I mean, how many stories have you read from engineers on here of having to deal with guitarists who come in and insist on using their shitty gear and shitty settings, and - SURPRISE! - it sounds shitty? Not to mention all the people I've encountered who are just absolutely braindead (the most recent gem being a dude at my local music store who insisted that he'd rather use a metal zone into the clean channel of a Mesa than the amp's distortion :Smug: )
In other words, there are a lot of people who think a Metal Zone "sounds good to them live"![]()
My point is, Sly already has plenty of experience with EMGs, so I think it would be beneficial for him to hear the blackouts in person (a comparable alternative to EMGs), based on the fact that an overwhelming amount of people have made the switch and enjoy them. I've noticed this on many forums as well.
I did not pay attention to specifics really, because I already know the general premise of the blackouts. I knew that some of the people praising them probably do not have much experience, but the sheer amount of interest would intrigue me enough. A recording can be just as biased as a gear review, especially to an impressionable guy who doesn't know much about recording. I've heard aboslutely shit clips of gear that I later played an loved.
-Joe
Does anyone on these other forums actually record anything, or are their observations just from chugging along in the room?Not saying Blackouts can't work for recording, but as a rule I never trust a guitarist's opinion about tone!
I think I'll just respond by re-quoting my post that started all this
You'll notice I'm not making any conclusive statements about the pickups, just advising caution at whose opinion one trusts![]()
If it was an amp or guitar then I would be way more weary!