Attributing random acts of violence by completely desocialized/insane individuals to groups such as ISIS simply because they share a common religion couldn't be more useful to the radicalists cause. Keep in mind by this "definition of common religion" even the most milquetoast christian would fall under the same blanket as the fucknut that decided to send children off on a crusade. Im not writing this in defense of religion, but for the love of whatever dont make it easier for ISIS and their ilk to recruit more morons by acting like cunts. If country A bombs country B because 0.0002% of country B don't like country A then a hell of a lot of previously disinterested people in country B will go "Those fucks bombed my house and killed my child, I don't think I much like them anymore". Though headlines of malcontents always have made for good new stories in the short term so lets make some money.
Tl;DR Shout all you want about the need to stop ISIS and the like, but for the love of god don't pull a Bush and bomb the hell out of a country thinking that will solve all the issues and somehow not result in all the bombed people hating us. Make a fucking plan before you invade another country, and stop overstating the impact terrorism has had on our lives. Yes, the few major acts in the west (and they are horrendous and tragic, dont mistake this for apathy) had a huge impact on the media, but you're still more likely to be killed by a cop than a terrorist. Hyping up the terrorist threat is a phenomenally effective political tool, not much else.
Again? Dear me lizard, you're on a roll! 
